Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788163›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2023

Establishing the Safe Space via Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling. Case Study: Fevipiprant/QAW039.

Alexandros Kourentas, Monika Gajewska, Wen Lin, Sundeep S Dhareshwar, Caroline Steib-Lauer, Swarupa Kulkarni, Stefan Hirsch, Tycho Heimbach, Martin Mueller-Zsigmondy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandros KourentasDissolution & Biopharmaceutics, Analytical Research and Development, Technical Research and Development, Novartis AG, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Monika GajewskaPharmacokinetics Sciences, Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis AG, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Wen LinPharmacokinetics Sciences, Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, New Jersey, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, 07936, USA.
Sundeep S DhareshwarGlobal Program Management, Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 07936, USA.
Caroline Steib-LauerAnalytical Research and Development, Technical Research and Development, Novartis AG, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Swarupa KulkarniPharmacokinetics Sciences, Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, New Jersey, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, 07936, USA.
Stefan HirschGlobal Drug Development, Technical Portfolio and Project Management, Technical Research and Development, Novartis AG, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Tycho HeimbachPharmacokinetics Sciences, Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, New Jersey, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, 07936, USA.
Martin Mueller-ZsigmondyDissolution & Biopharmaceutics, Analytical Research and Development, Technical Research and Development, Novartis AG, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. martin.mueller-zsigmondy@novartis.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic and absorption modeling has increasingly been implemented for biopharmaceutics applications to define the safe space for drug product quality attributes such as dissolution. For fevipiprant/QAW039, simulations were performed to assess the impact of in vitro dissolution on the in vivo performance of immediate-release film-coated tablets during development and scaling up to commercial scale. A fevipiprant dissolution safe space was established using observed clinical intravenous and oral PK data from bioequivalent and non-bioequivalent formulations. Quality control dissolution profiles with tablets were used as GastroPlus™ model inputs to estimate the in vivo dissolution in the gastrointestinal tract and to simulate human exposure. The model was used to evaluate the intraluminal performance of the dosage forms and to predict the absorption rate limits for the 450 mg dose. The predictive model performance was demonstrated for various oral dosage forms (150‒500 mg), including the non-bioequivalent batches in fasted healthy adults. To define the safe space at 450 mg, simulations were performed using theoretical dissolution profiles. A specification of Q = 80% dissolved in 60 min or less for an immediate-release oral solid dosage form reflected the boundaries of the safe space. The dissolution profile of the 450 mg commercial scale batch was within a dissolution region where bioequivalence is anticipated, not near an edge of failure for dissolution, providing additional confidence to the proposed acceptance criteria. Thus, the safe space allowed for a wider than 10% dissolution difference for bioequivalent batches, superseding f

Indexed as

BiopharmaceuticsModels, BiologicalAdministration, OralAdultHumansIndoleacetic AcidsPyridinesSolubilityTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyfevipiprantIndoleacetic AcidsPyridinesTabletsfevipiprantGastroPlus™PBBMsafe spacetwin-screw melt granulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.