ArticleBMJ open2023
Surgical site infection prevention in abdominal surgery: is intraoperative wound irrigation with antiseptics effective? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiseptic wound irrigation to prevent surgical site infection after laparotomy: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2025Pooled it
- Intraoperative Wound Irrigation in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Survey of Current Understanding and Practice Across the United States.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgical site infection (SSI) after laparotomy still represents the most frequent postoperative complicationin abdominal surgery. The effectiveness of reducing SSI rates by intra-operative irrigation of the incisional wound with antiseptic solutions or saline has been much debated, and recommendations on its use are divergent. Therefore, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, focusing specifically on procedures by laparotomy and considering recent evidence only. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. On 1 July 2022, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE were searched for the following predefined terms: (Surgical site infection) AND ((irrigation) OR (wound irrigation) OR (lavage)) AND ((abdominal surgery) OR (laparotomy). The search was limited to peer-revied publications, dating after 1 January 2000 in English or German language. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included for reference screening. Case reports, case series, non-systematic reviews and studies without follow-up information were excluded. The primary outcome is the rate of postoperative SSI after abdominal surgery by laparotomy. Meta-analysis is pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool, and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Completion of the analysis and publication is planned in March 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary for this study, as no new data will be collected. The results of the final study will be published in a peer-reviewed open-access journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022321458.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.