Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787979›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Systematic review of intervention functions, theoretical constructs and cultural adaptations of school-based smoking prevention interventions in low-income and middle-income countries.

Maryam Ba-Break, Bridgette Bewick, Reinhard Huss, Tim Ensor, Asma Abahussin, Hamdi Alhakimi, Helen Elsey

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryam Ba-BreakLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK m.m.ba-break@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-9259
Bridgette BewickLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Reinhard HussUniversal Basic Income Leeds Lab, Leeds, UK.
Tim EnsorLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-9576
Asma AbahussinDepartment of Biomedical Technology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hamdi AlhakimiHead of MedGebra Centre for Research Consultations, Epidemiologist and Community Medicine Specialist, MedGebra Centre for Research Consultations, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Helen ElseyHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-0581
University of Leeds · GBKing Saud University · SAUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the approaches and strategies used for ensuring cultural appropriateness, intervention functions and theoretical constructs of the effective and ineffective school-based smoking prevention interventions that were implemented in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). DATA SOURCES: Included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science and grey literature which were searched through August 2022 with no date limitations. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥6 months follow-up assessing the effect of school-based interventions on keeping pupils never-smokers in LMICs; published in English or Arabic. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Intervention data were coded according to the Theoretical Domains Framework, intervention functions of Behaviour Change Wheel and cultural appropriateness features. Using narrative synthesis we identified which cultural-adaptation features, theoretical constructs and intervention functions were associated with effectiveness. Findings were mapped against the capability-motivation and opportunity model to formulate the conclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

resultsWe identified 11 RCTs (n=7712 never-smokers aged 11-15); of which five arms were effective and eight (four of the effective) arms had a low risk of bias in all criteria. Methodological heterogeneity in defining, measuring, assessing and presenting outcomes prohibited quantitative data synthesis. We identified nine components that characterised interventions that were effective in preventing pupils from smoking uptake. These include deep cultural adaptation; raising awareness of various smoking consequences; improving refusal skills of smoking offers and using never-smokers as role models and peer educators.

conclusionInterventions that had used deep cultural adaptation which incorporated cultural, environmental, psychological and social factors, were more likely to be effective. Effective interventions considered improving pupils' psychological capability to remain never-smokers and reducing their social and physical opportunities and reflective and automatic motivations to smoke. Future trials should use standardised measurements of smoking to allow meta-analysis in future reviews.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesSmoking PreventionHumansChild protectionCommunity child healthInternational health servicesOrganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID36787979
PMCPMC9930567
OpenAlexW4320730866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.