ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2023
The efficacy of stenting in the iliofemoral vein of patients with venous obstruction and secondary lymphedema from malignancy.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gatekeeper or Pathfinder? The Evolving Role of Lymphedema Surgeons in the Assessment of Limb Swelling.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of the rate of concomitant proximal venous stenosis between the upper and lower extremities in patients with secondary lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2025Article
- Indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of stent placement in chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of venous stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction and secondary lymphedema from malignancy.
methodsFrom July 2012 to December 2020, patients with iliofemoral venous obstruction and secondary lymphedema who underwent venous stenting in our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, surgical complications, and symptom relief were assessed. Stent patency was evaluated with duplex ultrasound or computed tomographic venography. Twelve-month outcomes were reported.
resultsFifty-three patients with concurrent secondary lymphedema who had stents placed for iliofemoral venous obstruction were included. There were 42 females, and the mean age was 56.9 years. Nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were identified in 16 patients (30.1%). Immediate technical success was 100%, with an average of two stents implanted. The median Villalta score, and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life quality of life questionnaire scores decreased from 12 (IQR, 10-15) and 58 (IQR, 50-66) at baseline, respectively, to 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-6) and 28 (IQR, 22-45) at 12 months after the procedure (P < .05), showing significant improvement in the quality of life. At the end of a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-25 months), the cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 70.8%, 76.9%, and 90.1%, respectively.
conclusionsIn patients with secondary lymphedema from malignancy, venous stent placement is safe and effective for iliofemoral venous obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.