Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787685›Full record

ArticleCognition2023

Consequences of phonological variation for algorithmic word segmentation.

Caroline Beech, Daniel Swingley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline BeechDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S University Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: cbeech@sas.upenn.edu.
Daniel SwingleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S University Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: swingley@psych.upenn.edu.

Funding

Cross-disciplinary training in computational approaches to the neuroscience of audition and communicationT32DC016903 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Vijay Balasubramanian, Yale E Cohen · 2018 to 2026
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC016903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the first year, infants begin to learn the words of their language. Previous work suggests that certain statistical regularities in speech could help infants segment the speech stream into words, thereby forming a proto-lexicon that could support learning of the eventual vocabulary. However, computational models of word segmentation have typically been tested using language input that is much less variable than actual speech is. We show that using actual, transcribed pronunciations rather than dictionary pronunciations of the same speech leads to worse segmentation performance across models. We also find that phonologically variable input poses serious problems for lexicon building, because even correctly segmented word forms exhibit a complex, many-to-many relationship with speakers' intended words. Many phonologically distinct word forms were actually the same intended word, and many identical transcriptions came from different intended words. The fact that previous models appear to have substantially overestimated the utility of simple statistical heuristics suggests a need to consider the formation of the lexicon in infancy differently.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentSpeech PerceptionHumansInfantLanguageLearningSpeechVocabularyComputational modelingLanguage acquisitionPhonological variationWord segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36787685
PMCPMC10085835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.