Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787490›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023

Effects of Cascading Optical Processes: Part II: Impacts on Experimental Quantification of Sample Absorption and Scattering Properties.

Pathum Wathudura, Max Wamsley, Ankai Wang, Kexun Chen, Samadhi Nawalage, Hui Wang, Shengli Zou, Dongmao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pathum WathuduraDepartment of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39759, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-812X
Max WamsleyDepartment of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39759, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6790-4846
Ankai WangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816, United States.
Kexun ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.
Samadhi NawalageDepartment of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39759, United States.
Hui WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1874-5137
Shengli ZouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-133X
Dongmao ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39759, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2303-7338

Funding

Zinc dependent conformational changes in AdcR and their impact on DNA bindingP20GM103646 · NIGMS · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIBAUDEAU, GISELLE · 2013 to 2022
$21.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Part I of the three companion articles, we reported the effects of light scattering on experimental quantification of scattering extinction, intensity, and depolarization in solutions that contain only scatterers with no significant absorption and photoluminescence activities. The present work (Part II) studies the effects of light scattering and absorption on a series of optical spectroscopic measurements done on samples that contain both absorbers and scatterers, but not emitters. The experimental UV-vis spectrum is the sum of the sample absorption and scattering extinction spectra. However, the upper limit of the experimental Beer's-law-abiding extinction can be limited prematurely by the interference of forward scattered light. Light absorption reduces not only the sample scattering intensity but also the scattering depolarization. The impact of scattering on sample light absorption is complicated, depending on whether the absorption of scattered light is taken into consideration. Scattering reduces light absorption along the optical path length from the excitation source to the UV-vis detector. However, the absorption of the scattered light can be adequate to compensate the reduced light absorption along such optical path, making the impacts of light scattering on the sample total light absorption negligibly small (<10%). The latter finding constitutes a critical validation of the integrating-sphere-assisted resonance synchronous spectroscopic method for experimental quantification of absorption and scattering contribution to the sample UV-vis extinction spectra. The techniques and general guidelines provided in this work should help improve the reliability of optical spectroscopic characterization of nanoscale or larger materials, many of which are simultaneous absorbers and scatterers. The insights from this work are foundational for Part III of this series of work, which is on the cascading optical processes on spectroscopic measurements of fluorescent samples.

Identifiers

PMID36787490
PMCPMC12823025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.