Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787411›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2023

Tilting the Scale: Current Provider Perspectives and Practices on Breastfeeding with HIV in the United States.

Allison Lai, Elisabeth S Young, Hannah Kohrman, Gabriela Chateau, Deborah Cohan, Lealah Pollock, Monica Hahn, Barbara Namusaazi, Ornella Tankeu Toini, Judy Levison and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Importance of human milk for infants in the clinical setting: Updates and mechanistic links.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Allison LaiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7685-8140
Elisabeth S YoungDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Hannah KohrmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gabriela ChateauDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Deborah CohanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lealah PollockDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Monica HahnDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Barbara NamusaaziCommunity Advisor, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ornella Tankeu ToiniCommunity Advisor, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Judy LevisonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Theodore RuelDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Disease, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of vertical transmission from breastfeeding with HIV (BFHIV) has been found to be very low in optimal scenarios with sustained maternal viral suppression during pregnancy and postpartum. Medical providers must account for the risk of this serious adverse event alongside parental autonomy, breastfeeding benefits, and patient values. To assess provider practices, comfort, and challenges with BFHIV, an online mixed-method survey was sent to breastfeeding and HIV provider listservs from June to July 2021. The target population was US medical professionals from diverse practice settings with experience in clinical issues associated with BFHIV, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and lactation consultants. Data analysis utilized nonparametric hypothesis testing, ordinal regression, and reflexive thematic analysis. Most providers reported counseling pregnant people with HIV on infant feeding choices, but fewer specifically endorsed counseling about breastfeeding. Of 84 unique institutions identified by 100 included respondents, 10% had an institutional protocol supporting BFHIV. Institutional protocols were associated with higher degrees of provider comfort with BFHIV in optimal scenario clinical vignettes. Providers perceived that White patients faced fewer BFHIV barriers than patients with other racial identities. Discomfort balancing the goals to protect infants from infection risk and support the parent's role in infant feeding decisions was a key theme in free text responses; this manifested in a spectrum of management styles ranging from patient's informed choice to paternalism. This study highlights the tension providers navigate regarding BFHIV discussions, calling for patient care guidelines and protocols grounded in risk reduction and respect of patient autonomy.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPhysiciansBreast FeedingFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPostpartum PeriodPregnancyUnited Statesbreastfeedingbreastfeeding with HIVhigh-income countriesHIVnational guidelines

Identifiers

PMID36787411
PMCPMC9963479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.