Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787340›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2023

Suicidal ideation following self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms or serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in France: A propensity score weighted analysis from a cohort study.

Camille Davisse-Paturet, Massimiliano Orri, Stéphane Legleye, Aline-Marie Florence, Jean-Baptiste Hazo, Josiane Warszawski, Bruno Falissard, Marie-Claude Geoffroy, Maria Melchior, Alexandra Rouquette and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. IJMPR Didactic Paper: Weighting for Causal Inference in Mental Health Research.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 and Mental Health: A "Pandemic Within a Pandemic".Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille Davisse-PaturetUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inserm, UVSQ, CESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-7351
Massimiliano OrriMcGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-2610
Stéphane LegleyeUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inserm, UVSQ, CESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1704-2499
Aline-Marie FlorenceSorbonne University, Inserm, Pierre Louis institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Paris, France.
Jean-Baptiste HazoFrench Ministry of Solidarity and Health, Drees, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-4413
Josiane WarszawskiAPHP, Paris-Saclay University, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8590-7952
Bruno FalissardUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inserm, UVSQ, CESP, Paris, France.
Marie-Claude GeoffroyMcGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8587-8378
Maria MelchiorSorbonne University, Inserm, Pierre Louis institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-619X
Alexandra RouquetteUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inserm, UVSQ, CESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-1719
EPICOV study group
Inserm · FRMcGill University · CAMinistère des Solidarités et de la Santé · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA higher risk of suicidal ideation associated with self-report of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-like symptoms or COVID-19 infection has been observed in cross-sectional studies, but evidence from longitudinal studies remains limited. The aims of this study were 2-fold: (1) to explore if self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020 were associated with suicidal ideation in 2021; (2) to explore if the association also existed when using a biological marker of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in 2020. METHODS AND

findingsA total of 52,050 participants from the French EpiCov cohort were included (median follow-up time = 13.7 months). In terms of demographics, 53.84% were women, 60.92% were over 45 years old, 82.01% were born in mainland France from parents born in mainland France, and 59.38% completed high school. COVID-19-like symptoms were defined as participant report of a sudden loss of taste/smell or fever alongside cough, shortness of breath, or chest oppression, between February and November 2020. Symptoms were self-reported at baseline in May 2020 and at the first follow-up in Autumn 2020. Serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 was derived from Spike protein ELISA test screening in dried-blood-spot samples. Samples were collected from October 2020 to March 2021, with 94.4% collected in 2020. Suicidal ideation since December 2020 was self-reported at the second follow-up in Summer 2021. Associations of self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms and serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 with suicidal ideation in 2021 were ascertained using modified Poisson regression models, weighted by inverse probability weights computed from propensity scores. Among the 52,050 participants, 1.68% [1.54% to 1.82%] reported suicidal ideation in 2021, 9.57% [9.24% to 9.90%] had a serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020, and 13.23% [12.86% to 13.61%] reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020. Self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020 were associated with higher risks of later suicidal ideation in 2021 (Relative Riskipw [95% CI] = 1.43 [1.20 to 1.69]), while serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 was not (RRipw = 0.89 [0.70 to 1.13]). Limitations of this study include the use of a single question to assess suicidal ideation, the use of self-reported history of mental health disorders, and limited generalizability due to attrition bias.

conclusionsSelf-reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020, but not serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020, were associated with a higher risk of subsequent suicidal ideation in 2021. The exact role of SARS-CoV-2 infection with respect to suicide risk has yet to be clarified. Including mental health resources in COVID-19-related settings could encourage symptomatic individuals to care for their mental health and limit suicidal ideation to emerge or worsen.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreSARS-CoV-2Self ReportSuicidal Ideation

Identifiers

PMID36787340
PMCPMC10072374
OpenAlexW4320711697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.