Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787329›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Prenatal care and human rights: Addressing the gap between medical and legal frameworks and the experience of women in Brazil.

Camila Brito Rodrigues, Erika Barbara Abreu Fonseca Thomaz, Rosângela Fernandes Lucena Batista, Pía Riggirozzi, Dina Stefany de Oliveira Moreira, Laura Lamas Martins Gonçalves, Zeni Carvalho Lamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila Brito RodriguesFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1005-3267
Erika Barbara Abreu Fonseca ThomazDepartment of Public Health and Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Rosângela Fernandes Lucena BatistaDepartment of Public Health and Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Pía RiggirozziDepartment of Politics and International Relations, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Dina Stefany de Oliveira MoreiraFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Laura Lamas Martins GonçalvesPsychology Course, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Zeni Carvalho LamyDepartment of Public Health and Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos · BRUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R022933/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to quality and affordable healthcare is central to the fulfilment of women's reproductive and sexual health needs and rights. For this reason, the World Health Organization declared access to appropriate healthcare services during pregnancy and childbirth a fundamental women's right. Prenatal care is a recognized human right to women's health in Brazil, as declared by the 1988 Constitution and many Brazilian policies. However, implementing the rights to health in Brazil presents a fundamental performance gap between legal rights and their delivery concerning reproductive health. Through extensive fieldwork including focus groups, interviews with women and participate observation in two municipalities in northeastern Brazil, this article addresses these issues and explores women's lived experience of access to and their fulfilment of the right to health regarding prenatal healthcare. We offer and account of the experience of women regarding what they identified as barriers that trample their right to health, that is: a) limited personnel and medical equipment as a perception of neglect; b) timely delivery of services: time matters for perception and experience of rights; c) misinformation as a barrier to the exercise of health rights; and d) socioeconomic barriers. These barriers particularly affect the right of women in rural communities, with lower socioeconomic levels and education, as well as brown and black women, from an intersectionality perspective, who are already at greater health risk and inadequate prenatal care. As such, we argue there is a performance gap between what the normative and legal frameworks encourage the health system to do and what the system actually provides in terms of access, equality, respect and continuity of treatment amongst certain groups in society whose right to health are denied while their health risks increase.

Indexed as

Human RightsPrenatal CareBrazilFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancyWomen's Rights

Identifiers

PMID36787329
PMCPMC9928028
OpenAlexW4320710184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.