Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787314›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Respiratory system impedance in different decubitus evaluated by impulse oscillometry in individuals with obesity.

Mayara Holtz, Larissa Perossi, Jéssica Perossi, Daniele Oliveira Dos Santos, Hugo Celso Dutra de Souza, Ada Clarice Gastaldi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mayara HoltzHealth Sciences Department, Physiotherapy Course, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Larissa PerossiHealth Sciences Department, Physiotherapy Course, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jéssica PerossiHealth Sciences Department, Physiotherapy Course, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniele Oliveira Dos SantosHealth Sciences Department, Physiotherapy Course, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hugo Celso Dutra de SouzaHealth Sciences Department, Physiotherapy Course, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ada Clarice GastaldiHealth Sciences Department, Physiotherapy Course, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-3611
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe body posture can influence gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and mucociliary clearance and different positions can be used as a therapeutic strategy to improve in gas exchange and can also help physiotherapists to assist patients who have difficult or restrictions to stay seated or the ones who stay in the same position for a long period. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different positions on respiratory system impedance in obese and eutrophic subjects, using Impulse Oscillometry System (IOS).

methodsThe IOS parameters were evaluated in seated (Se), right lateral decubitus (RL), left lateral decubitus (LL), and supine (Su).

resultsSixty two volunteers were allocated in obese group (OG) or eutrophic group (EG) according to BMI. In seated position, OG showed higher impedance than EG for R5: 0.55 (0.31; 0.93) and 0.33 (0.24; 0.52); R20: 0.39 (0.23; 0.54) and 0.32 (0.03; 0.41); R5-R20: 0.13 (0.02; 0.47) and 0.01 (-0.08; 0.27); X5: -0.20 (-0.51; 0.16) and -0,10 (-0.016; -0.04); Fres: 20.59 (11.54; 36.45 and 10.69 (7.56; 24.7) (p<0.05) and the impedance were higher in the Su for both groups. Compared to Se, there were differences with Su (R5, R5-20, X5), with RL (R20), and with LL (R5, R20) for OG; and with Su (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres), with RL and LL (X5) for EG. Compared to Su, there were differences with RL and LL (R5-20, X5) for OG; and with RL (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres), and LL (R5-20, X5, Fres) for EG. There were no differences between RL and LL for OG and EG.

conclusionThe respiratory system impedance is increased in OG, with greater contribution of peripheral resistance. The higher values of resistance and reactance were obtained in the supine position, in both groups, with lower differences obtained in the right and left lateral decubitus.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveElectric ImpedanceForced Expiratory VolumeHumansOscillometryRespiratory SystemSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID36787314
PMCPMC9928067
OpenAlexW4320710516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.