Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787303›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A discrete model for the evaluation of public policies: The case of Colombia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Alexandra Catano-Lopez, Daniel Rojas-Diaz, Diana Paola Lizarralde-Bejarano, María Eugenia Puerta Yepes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra Catano-LopezDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4370-3382
Daniel Rojas-DiazDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Colombia.
Diana Paola Lizarralde-BejaranoDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-5055
María Eugenia Puerta YepesDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9991-5125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mathematical epidemiology, it is usual to implement compartmental models to study the transmission of diseases, allowing comprehension of the outbreak dynamics. Thus, it is necessary to identify the natural history of the disease and to establish promissory relations between the structure of a mathematical model, as well as its parameters, with control-related strategies (real interventions) and relevant socio-cultural behaviors. However, we identified gaps between the model creation and its implementation for the use of decision-makers for policy design. We aim to cover these gaps by proposing a discrete mathematical model with parameters having intuitive meaning to be implemented to help decision-makers in control policy design. The model considers novel contagion probabilities, quarantine, and diffusion processes to represent the recovery and mortality dynamics. We applied mathematical model for COVID-19 to Colombia and some of its localities; moreover, the model structure could be adapted for other diseases. Subsequently, we implemented it on a web platform (MathCOVID) for the usage of decision-makers to simulate the effect of policies such as lock-downs, social distancing, identification in the contagion network, and connectivity among populations. Furthermore, it was possible to assess the effects of migration and vaccination strategies as time-dependent inputs. Finally, the platform was capable of simulating the effects of applying one or more policies simultaneously.

Indexed as

COVID-19ColombiaCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPublic Policy

Identifiers

PMID36787303
PMCPMC9928135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.