ArticlePloS one2023
Divergence time of mites of the family Laelapidae based on mitochondrial barcoding region.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Laelapidae Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using the mitochondrial barcoding region to correlate research with 58 species in 19 genera of the family Laelapidae with the aim of determining the origin, phylogenetic relationships, and biogeographic historical distribution characteristics of mites in the family Laelapidae. Phylogenetic trees were obtained using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum-likelihood (ML) methods, based on three fossil records calibrated as molecular clock nodes, to estimate the divergence time of mites in the family Laelapidae as well as to apply Dispersal-Extinction-Cladogenesis (DEC) analyses to obtain biogeographic history inferences. The result showed species of the genera Hyperlaelaps and Haemolaelaps and some species of the genus Androlaelaps in the family Laelapidae were divided into clades of the genus Laelaps in both the BI and ML trees. Divergence time estimates and biogeographic history analysis revealed that the family Laelapidae likely diverged from other taxa during the Middle Jurassic (ca. 156.73 Mya), with Asia considered the most likely ancestral region for the family Laelapidae. Species of various genera began to undergo massive diversification events during the Cenozoic Tertiary. The results suggest that some genera in the family Laelapidae need to be re-defined or new genera need to be established; the Late Cretaceous to Late Neogene warm period would have promoted the divergence and expansion of species in the family Laelapidae. The divergence and dispersal of the family Laelapidae species is most likely a joint response to the continued northward drift of the Indian plate away from the Gondwana paleo-continent and gradually closer to Asia during the Late Cretaceous and the geological activity of the Tibetan Plateau during the Cenozoic Tertiary. The results strengthen our understanding of the origin and evolution of species in the family Laelapidae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.