Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787162›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Off-World Mental Health: Considerations for the Design of Well-being-Supportive Technologies for Deep Space Exploration.

Nathan Smith, Dorian Peters, Caroline Jay, Gro M Sandal, Emma C Barrett, Robert Wuebker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan Smith *Protective Security and Resilience Centre, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-8978
Dorian Peters *Centre for the Future of Intelligence, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4767-4198
Caroline Jay *School of Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-1382
Gro M Sandal *Department of Psychosocial Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9017-9654
Emma C Barrett *Department of Criminology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0762-5196
Robert WuebkerDavid Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Utah, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2951-705X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During future long-duration space exploration missions, humans will be exposed to combinations of extreme physical, psychological, and interpersonal demands. These demands create risks for the safety, performance, health, and well-being of both individuals and crew. The communication latency in deep space means that explorers will increasingly have to operate independently and take responsibility for their own self-care and self-management. At present, several research programs are focused on developing and testing digital technologies and countermeasures that support the effective functioning of deep space crews. Although promising, these initiatives have been stimulated mostly by technological opportunity rather than cogent theory. In this perspective, we argue that digital technologies developed for spaceflight should be informed by well-being-supportive design principles and be cognizant of broader conversations around the development and use of digital health applications, especially pertaining to issues of autonomy, privacy, and trust. These issues are important for designing potentially mission-critical health technologies and may be determining factors in the safe and successful completion of future off-world endeavors.

Indexed as

astronaut mental healthcountermeasuresdigital designhuman factorslong duration space explorationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID36787162
PMCPMC9975927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.