ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2023
Elucidating the Mechanisms of Dynamic and Robust Control of the Liver Homeostatic Renewal Process: Cell Network Modeling and Analysis.
Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent experimental investigations of liver homeostatic renewal have identified high replication capacity hepatocyte populations as the primary maintainers of liver mass. However, the molecular and cellular processes controlling liver homeostatic renewal remain unknown. To address this problem, we developed and analyzed a mathematical model describing cellular network interactions underlying liver homeostatic renewal. Model simulation results demonstrate that without feedback control, basic homeostatic renewal is not robust to disruptions, leading to tissue loss under persistent/repetitive insults. Consequently, we extended our basic model to incorporate putative regulatory interactions and investigated how such interactions may confer robustness on the homeostatic renewal process. We utilized a Design of Experiments approach to identify the combination of feedback interactions that yields a cell network model of homeostatic renewal capable of maintaining liver mass robustly during persistent/repetitive injury. Simulations of this robust model indicate that repeated injury destabilizes liver homeostasis within several months, which differs from epidemiological observations of a much slower decay of liver function occurring over several years. To address this discrepancy, we extended the model to include feedback control by liver nonparenchymal cells. Simulations and analysis of the final multicellular feedback control network suggest that achieving robust liver homeostatic renewal requires intrinsic stability in a hepatocellular network combined with feedback control by nonparenchymal cells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.