Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787023›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Comparison of the radiomics-based predictive models using machine learning and nomogram for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma.

Yusuke Kawazoe, Takehiro Shiinoki, Koya Fujimoto, Yuki Yuasa, Tsunahiko Hirano, Kazuto Matsunaga, Hidekazu Tanaka

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuke KawazoeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Takehiro ShiinokiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan. shiinoki@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0246-8489
Koya FujimotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yuki YuasaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Tsunahiko HiranoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Kazuto MatsunagaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Hidekazu TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K16789Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K07667Takeda Science Foundation Takeda Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop the predictive models for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and subtypes [exon 21-point mutation (L858R) and exon 19 deletion mutation (19Del)] and evaluate their clinical usefulness. Total 172 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. The analysis of variance and the least absolute shrinkage were used for feature selection from plain computed tomography images. Then, radiomic score (rad-score) was calculated for the training and test cohorts. Two machine learning (ML) models with 5-fold were applied to construct the predictive models with rad-score, clinical features, and the combination of rad-score and clinical features. The nomogram was developed using rad-score and clinical features. The prediction performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed using the best ML and nomogram models. In the test cohorts, the AUC of the best ML and the nomogram model were 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.87) and 0.79 (0.65-0.92) in the EGFR mutation groups, 0.83 (0.67-0.99) and 0.85 (0.72-0.97) in the L858R mutation groups, as well as 0.77 (0.58-0.97) and 0.77 (0.60-0.95) in the 19Del groups. The DCA showed that the nomogram models have comparable results with ML models. We constructed two predictive models for EGFR mutation status and subtypes. The nomogram models had comparable results to the ML models. Because the superiority of the performance of ML and nomogram models varied depending on the prediction groups, appropriate model selection is necessary.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansMachine LearningMutationNomogramsRetrospective StudiesErbB ReceptorsComputed tomographyEGFR mutationMachine learningNomogramRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID36787023
OpenAlexW4320709325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.