Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36787013›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2023

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol).

Christopher Gilligan, Diane Burnside, Lisa Grant, R Jason Yong, Peter M Mullins, Frank Schwab, Nagy Mekhail

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02577354 nacompletednot on this map

ReActiv8 Implantable Neurostimulation System for Chronic Low Back Pain (ReActiv8-B)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMainstay MedicalRan2016 to 2024Enrolled204ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsReActiv8 Implantable Stimulation System (Patient Appropriate Stimulation), ReActiv8 Implantable Stimulation System (Low Stimulation)
NCT04803214 nacompletednot on this map

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMainstay MedicalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled203ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsReActiv8
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher GilliganDivision of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. cgilligan@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-9907
Diane BurnsideMainstay Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lisa GrantMainstay Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
R Jason YongDivision of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter M MullinsDivision of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Frank SchwabNorthwell Health Orthopaedic Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Nagy MekhailCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMedica (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USNorthwell Health Orthopaedic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. The role of restorative neurostimulation in the treatment of patients with refractory mechanical CLBP and multifidus muscle dysfunction has been established in one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and several clinical studies that demonstrated both safety and clinical benefit. This post-market trial provides a direct comparison to optimized medical management to test the hypothesis that the addition of restorative neurostimulation to current care paradigms results in significant improvements in back pain-related disability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial will include people who have reported significant levels of back pain and back pain-related disability with symptoms that have persisted for longer than 6 months prior to enrollment and resulted in pain on most days in the 12 months prior to enrollment. Eligible patients will be randomized to either optimal medical management or optimal medical management plus ReActiv8® restorative neurostimulation therapy. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected at regular intervals out to the 1-year primary endpoint, at which time the patients in the control arm will be offered implantation with the ReActiv8 system. Assessment of each group will continue for an additional year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RESTORE trial follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The WCG IRB acts as the Central Institutional Review Board (IRB) for most sites and some sites will receive local IRB approval prior to enrollment of patients. Each IRB assessed the protocol and related documentation. The protocol complies with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). All patients provide written informed consent to participate in the trial. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version C, 07 Sep 2022. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration number. NCT04803214 registered March 17, 2021.

Indexed as

Chronic low back painMultifidusProtocolRestorative neurostimulationStimulation

Identifiers

PMID36787013
PMCPMC10036695
OpenAlexW4320709920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.