Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36786976›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nephrology2023

Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review.

Francesco Sanmarchi, Claudio Fanconi, Davide Golinelli, Davide Gori, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Angelo Capodici

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco SanmarchiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio FanconiDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Davide GolinelliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Davide GoriDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Angelo CapodiciDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy. angelo.capodici@studio.unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-0702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this systematic review we aimed at assessing how artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) techniques have been deployed to predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease (CKD). We systematically reviewed the available evidence on these innovative techniques to improve CKD diagnosis and patient management.

methodsWe included English language studies retrieved from PubMed. The review is therefore to be classified as a "rapid review", since it includes one database only, and has language restrictions; the novelty and importance of the issue make missing relevant papers unlikely. We extracted 16 variables, including: main aim, studied population, data source, sample size, problem type (regression, classification), predictors used, and performance metrics. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) approach; all main steps were done in duplicate.

resultsFrom a total of 648 studies initially retrieved, 68 articles met the inclusion criteria. Models, as reported by authors, performed well, but the reported metrics were not homogeneous across articles and therefore direct comparison was not feasible. The most common aim was prediction of prognosis, followed by diagnosis of CKD. Algorithm generalizability, and testing on diverse populations was rarely taken into account. Furthermore, the clinical evaluation and validation of the models/algorithms was perused; only a fraction of the included studies, 6 out of 68, were performed in a clinical context.

conclusionsMachine learning is a promising tool for the prediction of risk, diagnosis, and therapy management for CKD patients. Nonetheless, future work is needed to address the interpretability, generalizability, and fairness of the models to ensure the safe application of such technologies in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRenal Insufficiency, ChronicArtificial IntelligenceHumansArtificial intelligenceChronic kidney diseaseMachine learningSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36786976
PMCPMC10227138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.