Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36786927›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer.

Christiane Hey, Almut Goeze, Robert Sader, Eugen Zaretsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Possible Clinical Predictors for Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients after Surgery.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christiane Hey *Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Marburg University Hospital, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Almut Goeze *Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Marburg University Hospital, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Robert SaderOral, Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Frankfurt (Main) University Hospital, University of Frankfurt (Main), Frankfurt (Main), Germany.
Eugen ZaretskyDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Marburg University Hospital, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. zaretsky@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5954-4315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOropharyngeal dysphagia is one of the most common postoperative consequences in head and neck cancer patients. Above all, these patients often suffer from aspiration and limitations of oral intake. However, no reliable dysphagia screening is available for this target group. This study aimed to develop and validate a screening, FraMaDySc, based on a water swallow test (WST) for the identification of postsurgical patients with a risk of aspiration, limitations of oral intake, and, as their derivate, a relevant oropharyngeal dysphagia in general (OD) that constituted the main reference standard.

methodsA total of 184 postsurgical head and neck cancer patients were tested with a WST. The patients were, on average, 62 years old and predominantly male (71%). After WST, they underwent Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES

resultsOD was found in 65% of patients, aspiration in 44%, limitations of oral intake in 56%. WST delivered a "fail" result in 65% of patients. WST showed sensitivity 91% and specificity 88% for OD. Quality criteria for aspiration (sensitivity 64%, specificity 93%) and limitations of oral intake (sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%) were lower.

conclusionFraMaDySc is a standardized, quick, and valid WST and therefore an excellent screening tool for the identification of OD in postoperative head and neck cancer patients.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersHead and Neck NeoplasmsDeglutitionEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory AspirationDysphagiaHead and neck cancerPostsurgicalScreeningSwallowing disorder

Identifiers

PMID36786927
PMCPMC10066133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.