ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Repeat uterine artery embolization (UAE) for recurrent postpartum hemorrhage in patients who underwent UAE after a previous delivery: a multicenter study.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting the therapeutic efficacy of uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis using a combined model based on MRI radiomics and clinical characteristics.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Impact of Uterine Artery Embolization on Subsequent Fertility Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of 20 Years of Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Association between uterine artery embolization for postpartum hemorrhage and second delivery on maternal and offspring outcomes: a nationwide cohort study.Human reproduction open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate angiographic findings and outcomes of repeat uterine artery embolization (UAE) for recurrent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in patients who previously underwent UAE for PPH after a previous delivery. MATERIALS AND
methodsAmong 1805 patients who underwent UAE for PPH from 2007 to 2020 at four participating hospitals, the data of 21 (1.16%) patients who underwent UAE for PPH after subsequent delivery were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The rate of placental abnormalities, causes of PPH, angiographic findings, and clinical success rate were evaluated.
resultsThe technical success rates were 100% and 95.2%, and clinical success rates were 85.7% and 95.2% in association with first and second UAEs, respectively. The time intervals between first and second UAEs ranged from 15.6 to 103.3 months (46.5 ± 25.0 months). The rate of placental abnormalities was significantly higher in association with second UAEs than with first UAEs (71.4% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.034). The causes of PPH were different between first and second UAEs with borderline significance (p = 0.049); uterine atony (81.0%) and placenta accreta spectrum (57.1%) were most common in association with first and second UAEs, respectively. During second UAEs, obliterated arteries were observed in 27 uterine arteries (27/42, 64.3%) of 16 patients (16/21, 76.2%), with partial obliteration predominating over total obliteration. Collateral arteries were observed in 15 patients during second UAEs.
conclusionRepeat UAE is safe and effective for recurrent PPH after subsequent delivery in patients with prior UAE. Obliteration of UAs and formation of collateral arteries are common at the second UAEs. KEY POINTS: • The rate of placental abnormalities was significantly higher in association with second UAEs than with first UAEs (71.4% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.034). • Obliteration of UAs and formation of collateral arteries are common at the second UAEs. • Repeat UAE is safe and effective for recurrent PPH after subsequent delivery in patients with prior UAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.