Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36786880›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023

Imaging of intracranial aneurysms in animals: a systematic review of modalities.

Anne F Cayron, Sandrine Morel, Eric Allémann, Philippe Bijlenga, Brenda R Kwak

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne F CayronDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-7295
Sandrine MorelDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1538-3553
Eric AllémannSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6598-9521
Philippe BijlengaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences - Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-2757
Brenda R KwakDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. Brenda.KwakChanson@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-0044
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

Fondation Privée des HUG CONFIRM RC05.02Schweizerische Herzstiftung FF20024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysm (IA) animal models are paramount to study IA pathophysiology and to test new endovascular treatments. A number of in vivo imaging modalities are available to characterize IAs at different stages of development in these animal models. This review describes existing in vivo imaging techniques used so far to visualize IAs in animal models. We systematically searched for studies containing in vivo imaging of induced IAs in animal models in PubMed and SPIE Digital library databases between 1 January 1945 and 13 July 2022. A total of 170 studies were retrieved and reviewed in detail, and information on the IA animal model, the objective of the study, and the imaging modality used was collected. A variety of methods to surgically construct or endogenously induce IAs in animals were identified, and 88% of the reviewed studies used surgical methods. The large majority of IA imaging in animals was performed for 4 reasons: basic research for IA models, testing of new IA treatment modalities, research on IA in vivo imaging of IAs, and research on IA pathophysiology. Six different imaging techniques were identified: conventional catheter angiography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, hemodynamic imaging, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescence imaging. This review presents and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of all in vivo IA imaging techniques used in animal models to help future IA studies finding the most appropriate IA imaging modality and animal model to answer their research question.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimal modelsDiagnostic imagingDiagnostic techniqueIntracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID36786880
PMCPMC9928939
OpenAlexW4320709851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.