ArticleHeart and vessels2023
First clinical experience using a novel automated mapping algorithm for mapping of ventricular arrhythmias.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new automated vector-based mapping algorithm (AMA) for 3-dimensional (3D) mapping has been introduced. The aim of this study was to present our experience using AMA to recognize additional catheter ablation targets in patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA). A total of 16 patients (ICM; ischemic cardiomyopathy, n = 6; NICM; non-ischemic cardiomyopathy n = 10) suffering from VA underwent catheter ablation. Following bipolar voltage mapping, AMA was utilized to reveal zones of decelerated conduction velocity vectors (CVV) and this information was superimposed onto the 3D reconstructions and compared with the presence of scar. Mapping time was 28.1 ± 10 min for the endocardial reconstruction of the left ventricle (LV) and 17 ± 5.4 min for the epicardium (n = 6 patients). The mean area of LV low voltage was 13.9 ± 15% (endocardial) and 11.9 ± 5.7% (epicardial). Decelerating CVV zones were revealed in all patients (mean conduction velocity threshold of 39.3 ± 13%). Sustained VA have been terminated through ablation and substrate modification was performed in all patients. Correlation between the presence of CVV deceleration zones and areas of abnormal low voltage from bipolar mapping was revealed in only 37.5% of patients, but there was good correlation between scar from unipolar voltage mapping and the presence of CCV deceleration zones (94%; p = 0.008). The novel AMA may improve the understanding of individual VA substrates due to the visualization of decelerated CVV zones and their correlation with abnormal low voltage predominantly from unipolar mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.