Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36786831›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene

Characterization of perceived biohazard exposures, personal protective equipment, and training resources among a sample of formal U.S. solid waste workers: A pilot study.

Aurora B Le, Abas Shkembi, Anupon Tadee, Anna C Sturgis, Shawn G Gibbs, Richard L Neitzel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aurora B LeDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-6866-6779
Abas ShkembiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-861X
Anupon TadeeDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-8211
Anna C SturgisDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Shawn G GibbsDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-5166
Richard L NeitzelDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-2589
University of Michigan · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, the majority of waste workers work with solid waste. In solid waste operations, collection, sorting, and disposal can lead to elevated biohazard exposures (e.g., bioaerosols, bloodborne and other pathogens, human and animal excreta). This cross-sectional pilot study aimed to characterize solid waste worker perception of biohazard exposures, as well as worker preparedness and available resources (e.g., access to personal protective equipment, level of training) to address potential biohazard exposures. Three sites were surveyed: (1) a family-owned, small-scale waste disposal facility, (2) a county-level, recycling-only facility, and (3) an industrial-sized, large-scale facility that contains a hauling and landfill division. Survey items characterized occupational biohazards, resources to mitigate and manage those biohazards, and worker perceptions of biohazard exposures. Descriptive statistics were generated. The majority of workers did not report regularly coming into contact with blood, feces, and bodily fluids (79%). As such, less than one-fifth were extremely concerned about potential illness from biological exposures (19%). Yet, most workers surveyed (71%) reported an accidental laceration/cut that would potentially expose workers to biohazards. This study highlights the need for additional research on knowledge of exposure pathways and perceptions of the severity of exposure among this occupational group.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureCross-Sectional StudiesHazardous SubstancesHumansPersonal Protective EquipmentPilot ProjectsSolid WasteUnited StatesHazardous SubstancesSolid WasteBiological exposuresoccupational healthPPEwaste employees

Identifiers

PMID36786831
PMCPMC11826414
OpenAlexW4320710134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.