Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36786324›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2023

Disrupting future discounting: a commentary on an underutilised psychological approach for improving adherence to diet and physical activity interventions.

Naomi Kakoschke, David N Cox, Jillian Ryan, Ian Gwilt, Aaron Davis, Paul Jansons, Barbora de Courten, Grant Brinkworth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi KakoschkeHuman Health, CSIRO Health & Biosecurity, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-5668
David N CoxHuman Health, CSIRO Health & Biosecurity, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7625-0098
Jillian RyanHuman Health, CSIRO Health & Biosecurity, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide5000, Australia.
Ian GwiltUniSA Creative, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Aaron DavisUniSA Creative, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Paul JansonsSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Barbora de CourtenHealth and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia.
Grant BrinkworthHuman Health, CSIRO Health & Biosecurity, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide5000, Australia.
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUDeakin University · AURMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCD) such as CVD and type 2 diabetes mellitus are major contributors to the burden of disease. NCD are largely driven by modifiable lifestyle factors including poor diet and insufficient physical activity, and consequently, prevention is a public health priority. Although diet and physical activity levels can be improved via lifestyle interventions, long-term adherence to such interventions remains low, which limits their effectiveness. Thus, it is critical to identify the underlying mechanisms that challenge uptake and adherence to such interventions. The current commentary discusses an important, but underexplored, psychological driver of poor adherence to lifestyle interventions, namely, future discounting, which describes the tendency to prefer smaller, short-term rewards over larger, long-term rewards. For example, in the nutrition domain, future discounting refers to valuing the immediate reward of excessive intake of energy-dense, nutrient-poor, discretionary foods high in salt, sugar, and saturated fat, and insufficient intake of low-energy, nutrient-dense, whole foods such as vegetables. Prominent theoretical models propose that excessive future discounting is a major contributor to the development of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. Furthermore, a vast body of evidence suggests that future discounting plays a key role in risk of NCD. Thus, the evidence to date supports the idea that future discounting is an important multi-behaviour target for supporting lifestyle behaviour change; however, this approach has been largely neglected in preventive health efforts. Furthermore, this commentary discusses promising techniques (e.g. Episodic Future Thinking) for disrupting future discounting to promote improved adherence to lifestyle interventions aimed at reducing NCD risk.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Noncommunicable DiseasesDietExerciseHumansLife StyleRewardEpisodic future thinkingFuture discountingLifestyle behavioural interventionsNon-communicable disease risk

Identifiers

PMID36786324
PMCPMC10346014
OpenAlexW4320710237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.