Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785917›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2023

Cost-effectiveness of pancreas surveillance: The CDKN2A-p16-Leiden cohort.

Isaura S Ibrahim, Hans F A Vasen, Martin N J M Wasser, Shirin Feshtali, Bert A Bonsing, Hans Morreau, Akin Inderson, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Wilbert B van den Hout

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. UEG Journal's impact and vision for the future.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isaura S IbrahimDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6457-1502
Hans F A VasenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martin N J M WasserDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Shirin FeshtaliDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hans MorreauDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Akin IndersonDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen CappelDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Wilbert B van den HoutDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-0135
Leiden University Medical Center · NLIsala · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCDKN2A-p16-Leiden mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with very poor survival. Surveillance may improve prognosis.

objectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of surveillance, as compared to no surveillance.

methodsIn 2000, a surveillance program was initiated at Leiden University Medical Center with annual MRI and optional endoscopic ultrasound. Data were collected on the resection rate of screen-detected tumors and on survival. The Kaplan-Meier method and a parametric cure model were used to analyze and compare survival. Based on the surveillance and survival data from the screening program, a state-transition model was constructed to estimate lifelong outcomes.

resultsA total of 347 mutation carriers participated in the surveillance program. PDAC was detected in 31 patients (8.9%) and the tumor could be resected in 22 patients (71.0%). Long-term cure among patients with resected PDAC was estimated at 47.1% (p < 0.001). The surveillance program was estimated to reduce mortality from PDAC by 12.1% and increase average life expectancy by 2.10 years. Lifelong costs increased by €13,900 per patient, with a cost-utility ratio of €14,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained. For annual surveillance to have an acceptable cost-effectiveness in other settings, lifetime PDAC risk needs to be 10% or higher.

conclusionThe tumor could be resected in most patients with a screen-detected PDAC. These patients had considerably better survival and as a result annual surveillance was found to be cost-effective.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16HumansPancreasCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16CDKN2A-p16-Leiden mutation carrierscost-effectivenesshigh-riskPDACsurveillancesurvival

Identifiers

PMID36785917
PMCPMC10039795
OpenAlexW4320709055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.