Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785909›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

The impact of a new intervention for venous leg ulcers: A within-patient controlled trial.

Richard Hillson Bull, Donna Clements, Agnes Juguilon Collarte, Keith Gordon Harding

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03396731 (A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomised, Assessor Blinded Study Comparing the Efficacy, Including Patient Reported Outcomes of Two Different Daily gekoTM Treatment Durations in Conjunction With Standard Care, With Each Other and to Standard Care Alone, in Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03396731 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomised, Assessor Blinded Study Comparing the Efficacy, Including Patient Reported Outcomes of Two Different Daily gekoTM Treatment Durations in Conjunction With Standard Care, With Each Other and to Standard Care Alone, in Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirstkind LtdRan2018 to 2022Enrolled171ConditionsVenous Leg Ulcer, Leg Ulcers Venous, Leg Ulcer, Wound LegArmsgeko™ medical device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard Hillson BullAccelerate CIC, Centenary Wing, St Joseph's Hospice, London, UK.
Donna ClementsCRN Eastern, Norfolk Community Health and Care Trust, Norwich, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-1575
Agnes Juguilon CollarteNorth West Division (Central London, Hammersmith & Fulham and West London), St Charles Centre for Health & Wellbeing, London, UK.
Keith Gordon HardingWWII Ltd (Welsh Wound Innovation Initiative), Welsh Wound Innovation Centre, Pontyclun, UK.
Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water (United Kingdom) · GBNorfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust · GBNorth West London Pathology · GBSt Christopher's Hospice · GB

Funding

Firstkind LtdFirstkind Medical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major obstacle to the development of new treatments for venous leg ulcers is the difficulty in generating evidence for their effectiveness. Randomised controlled trials using complete healing as the endpoint are seldom powered to be successful, owing to the heterogeneity of cohorts. A novel approach to the evaluation of treatments is presented, using a self-controlled trial model and two metrics of short-term healing rate as alternate endpoints: rate of wound margin advance, and percentage area reduction over 4 weeks. Two different treatment regimens are compared: multi-layer compression alone, versus multi-layer compression combined with activation of the venous leg pump by neuromuscular stimulation. With 60 patients, adding neuromuscular stimulation to multilayer compression resulted in a significant two-fold increase in the rate of wound healing over a 4-week period, both in terms of wound margin advance and in terms of percentage area reduction. The use of these short-term intermediate endpoint metrics together with a self-controlled study design offers potential for distinguishing between the relative efficacies of interventions more rapidly, with greater sensitivity, and with fewer subjects than a conventional RCT cohort model.

Indexed as

Leg UlcerVaricose UlcerCompression BandagesHumansPressureRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVeinsWound Healingalternate healing endpointNMESPARself-controlled trialvenous leg ulcersWMA

Identifiers

PMID36785909
PMCPMC10333027
OpenAlexW4320709118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.