ArticleMicroprocessors and microsystems2023
A novel firefly algorithm approach for efficient feature selection with COVID-19 dataset.
Article in Microprocessors and microsystems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A two-stage preprocessing and classification approach for accurate COVID-19 detection in X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An optimal neural network to design generators and stabilizers for multi-machine power systems based on a promoted firefly algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Explainable LSTM-Based Intrusion Detection System Optimized by Firefly Algorithm for IoT Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A BiLSTM model enhanced with multi-objective arithmetic optimization for COVID-19 diagnosis from CT images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Concordance and generalization of an AI algorithm with real-world clinical data in the pre-omicron and omicron era.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Multi-feature fusion and dandelion optimizer based model for automatically diagnosing the gastrointestinal diseases.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feature selection is one of the most important challenges in machine learning and data science. This process is usually performed in the data preprocessing phase, where the data is transformed to a proper format for further operations by machine learning algorithm. Many real-world datasets are highly dimensional with many irrelevant, even redundant features. These kinds of features do not improve classification accuracy and can even shrink down performance of a classifier. The goal of feature selection is to find optimal (or sub-optimal) subset of features that contain relevant information about the dataset from which machine learning algorithms can derive useful conclusions. In this manuscript, a novel version of firefly algorithm (FA) is proposed and adapted for feature selection challenge. Proposed method significantly improves performance of the basic FA, and also outperforms other state-of-the-art metaheuristics for both, benchmark bound-constrained and practical feature selection tasks. Method was first validated on standard unconstrained benchmarks and later it was applied for feature selection by using 21 standard University of California, Irvine (UCL) datasets. Moreover, presented approach was also tested for relatively novel COVID-19 dataset for predicting patients health, and one microcontroller microarray dataset. Results obtained in all practical simulations attest robustness and efficiency of proposed algorithm in terms of convergence, solutions' quality and classification accuracy. More precisely, the proposed approach obtained the best classification accuracy on 13 out of 21 total datasets, significantly outperforming other competitor methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.