Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785834›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Automatic treatment outcome prediction with DeepInteg based on multimodal radiological images in rectal cancer.

Yihuang Hu, Juan Li, Zhuokai Zhuang, Bin Xu, Dabiao Wang, Huichuan Yu, Lanlan Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01211210 (A Phase II/III Randomized Controlled Study of Neoadjuvant FOLFOX6 Treatment With or Without Radiation Compared to 5-Fu Based Chemoradiation in Treating Patients With Resectable Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01211210 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase II/III Randomized Controlled Study of Neoadjuvant FOLFOX6 Treatment With or Without Radiation Compared to 5-Fu Based Chemoradiation in Treating Patients With Resectable Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2010 to 2020Enrolled495ConditionsRectal CancerArmsfluorouracil, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yihuang HuFujian Key Lab for Intelligent Processing and Wireless Transmission of Media Information, College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Juan LiDepartment of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China.
Zhuokai ZhuangGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China.
Bin XuFujian Key Lab for Intelligent Processing and Wireless Transmission of Media Information, College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Dabiao WangCollege of Chemical and Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Huichuan YuGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China.
Lanlan LiFujian Key Lab for Intelligent Processing and Wireless Transmission of Media Information, College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Fuzhou University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant systemic treatment before surgery is a prevalent regimen in the patients with advanced-stage or high-risk tumor, which has shaped the treatment strategies and cancer survival in the past decades. However, some patients present with poor response to the neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop tools to help distinguish the patients that could achieve pathological complete response before surgery to avoid inappropriate treatment. Here, this study demonstrated a multi-task deep learning tool called DeepInteg. In the DeepInteg framework, the segmentation module was constructed based on the CE-Net with a context extractor to achieve end-to-end delineation of region of interest (ROI) from radiological images, then the features of segmented Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) images of each case were fused and input to the classification module based on a convolution neural network for treatment outcome prediction. The dataset with 1700 MRI and CT slices collected from the prospectively randomized clinical trial (NCT01211210) on systemic treatment for rectal cancer was used to develop and systematically optimize DeepInteg. As a result, DeepInteg achieved automatic segmentation of tumoral ROI with Dices of 0.766 and 0.719 and mIoUs of 0.788 and 0.756 in CT and MRI images, respectively. In addition, DeepInteg achieved AUC of 0.833, accuracy of 0.826 and specificity of 0.856 in the prediction for pathological complete response after treatment, which showed better performance compared with the model based on CT or MRI alone. This study provide a robust framework to develop disease-specific tools for automatic delineation of ROI and clinical outcome prediction. The well-trained DeepInteg could be readily applied in clinic to predict pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

CTDeep learningMRINeoadjuvant therapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36785834
PMCPMC9918765
OpenAlexW4317937009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.