ArticleHeliyon2023
The role of active learning methods in teaching pharmaceutical care - Scoping review.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Drawing-based instruction enhances practical performance and academic flow in cardiovascular and respiratory anatomy education: a quasi-experimental study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Classroom to Cleanroom: Evaluating Industrial Field Visits as a Pedagogical Tool in Parenteral Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Quality Control Education.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Characterization of the learning environment for teaching pharmaceutical care: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Implementing a Functional Group Analysis Activity to Support Student Learning in Medicinal Chemistry: A Three-Year Experience.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preparedness and barriers to pharmaceutical care among final-year pharmacy students and recent graduates: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pharmacists in a community pharmacies have already provided, or will provide in the near future advanced pharmaceutical care services. This requires modifying the approach to teaching pharmacy students as well as adapting the curriculum to the changing professional realities. It has been proven that in the field of medical and related sciences, learners-centered active teaching methods allow to achieve learning outcomes effectively, especially in the field of practical skills. Objectives: As the pharmaceutical services are only being introduced in many European countries, the question arises as to what active learning methods to use to prepare pharmacy graduates for this. Thus the review of worldwide literature occurred to be helpful in identifying what active learning methods are being used specifically in teaching aspects of pharmaceutical care. Methods: Three electronic databases: Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched using the keywords "active learning" and "pharmaceutical care". Results: On the basis of the publications included in the review, 7 methods were distinguished. Case-study, role play and simulation exercises turned out to be the most popular. It was also possible to make preliminary conclusions on how to properly match the method to the learning outcomes. Moreover, a weak point of many studies was the lack of structured methods of assessing the skills acquired by the students. Conclusions: In conclusion, the curriculum renewal in pharmacy is necessary and requires taking many aspects into account, from the types of tasks assigned to pharmacists, through the selection of appropriate teaching methods, to the verification of assessment methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.