Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785663›Full record

ReviewACS measurement science au2022

Next-Generation Diagnostic Wound Dressings for Diabetic Wounds.

Tracy Fu, Polina Stupnitskaia, Simon Matoori

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS measurement science au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Hydrogels for Analyte Sensing.ACS measurement science au · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Breakthrough Technologies in Diagnosis and Therapy of Chronic Wounds.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Diabetes and its Complications.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy FuFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Polina StupnitskaiaFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Simon MatooriFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic lower extremity wounds (diabetic foot ulcers) are a serious and prevalent complication of diabetes. These wounds exhibit low healing rates and present a high risk of amputation. Current diagnostic options for foot ulcers are limited to macroscopic wound analysis such as wound depth, implicated tissues, and infection. Molecular diagnostics promises to improve foot ulcer diagnosis, staging, and assessment of the treatment response. In this perspective, we report recent progress in understanding the pathophysiology of diabetic wound healing and point to recently emerged novel molecular targets for wound diagnostics. We discuss selected diagnostic wound dressings under preclinical development that detect one or several inflammatory markers, bacterial secretions, hyperglycemia, and mechanical stress. We also highlight key translational challenges of investigational diagnostic bandages for diabetic foot ulcers.

Identifiers

PMID36785663
PMCPMC9885997
OpenAlexW4285089906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.