Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785654›Full record

ReviewSpace science reviews2023

Synergies Between Venus & Exoplanetary Observations: Venus and Its Extrasolar Siblings.

M J Way, Colby Ostberg, Bradford J Foley, Cedric Gillmann, Dennis Höning, Helmut Lammer, Joseph O'Rourke, Moa Persson, Ana-Catalina Plesa, Arnaud Salvador and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Space science reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

M J WayNASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3728-0475
Colby OstbergDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA.
Bradford J FoleyDepartment of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA.
Cedric GillmannDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005 USA.
Dennis HöningPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Helmut LammerSpace Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria.
Joseph O'RourkeSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
Moa PerssonInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France.
Ana-Catalina PlesaInstitute of Planetary Research, DLR, Berlin, Germany.
Arnaud SalvadorDepartment of Astronomy and Planetary Science, Northern Arizona University, Box 6010, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
Manuel ScherfSpace Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria.
Matthew WellerLunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Blvd., Houston, TX 77058 USA.
Austrian Academy of Sciences · ATArizona State University · USGoddard Institute for Space Studies · USLunar and Planetary Institute · USPennsylvania State University · USPlanet · DEPlanetary Science Institute · USPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research · DERice University · USUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we examine how our knowledge of present day Venus can inform terrestrial exoplanetary science and how exoplanetary science can inform our study of Venus. In a superficial way the contrasts in knowledge appear stark. We have been looking at Venus for millennia and studying it via telescopic observations for centuries. Spacecraft observations began with Mariner 2 in 1962 when we confirmed that Venus was a hothouse planet, rather than the tropical paradise science fiction pictured. As long as our level of exploration and understanding of Venus remains far below that of Mars, major questions will endure. On the other hand, exoplanetary science has grown leaps and bounds since the discovery of Pegasus 51b in 1995, not too long after the golden years of Venus spacecraft missions came to an end with the Magellan Mission in 1994. Multi-million to billion dollar/euro exoplanet focused spacecraft missions such as JWST, and its successors will be flown in the coming decades. At the same time, excitement about Venus exploration is blooming again with a number of confirmed and proposed missions in the coming decades from India, Russia, Japan, the European Space Agency (ESA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Here we review what is known and what we may discover tomorrow in complementary studies of Venus and its exoplanetary cousins.

Indexed as

ExoplanetsVenus

Identifiers

PMID36785654
PMCPMC9911515
OpenAlexW4319661722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.