Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785647›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive medicine2022

Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Jiangli Cheng, Aijia Ma, Meiling Dong, Yongfang Zhou, Bo Wang, Yang Xue, Peng Wang, Jing Yang, Yan Kang

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05922631 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation vs. Low Tidal Volume Ventilation on Right Heart Function in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorXiaoJing Zou,MDRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsRight Heart Failure, Mechanical Ventilation, Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmsAirway pressure release ventilation, low tidal volume
NCT06755320 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDSArmsmechanical ventilation (MV)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiangli ChengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Aijia MaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Meiling DongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Yongfang ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Bo WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Yang XueDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Yan KangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential life support method for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is one of the most common critical illnesses with high mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). A lung-protective ventilation strategy based on low tidal volume (LTV) has been recommended since a few years; however, as this did not result in a significant decrease of ARDS-related mortality, a more optimal ventilation mode was required. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is an old method defined as a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with a brief intermittent release phase based on the open lung concept; it also perfectly fits the ARDS treatment principle. Despite this, APRV has not been widely used in the past, rather only as a rescue measure for ARDS patients who are difficult to oxygenate. Over recent years, with an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ARDS, APRV has been reproposed to improve patient prognosis. Nevertheless, this mode is still not routinely used in ARDS patients given its vague definition and complexity. Consequently, in this paper, we summarize the studies that used APRV in ARDS, including adults, children, and animals, to illustrate the settings of parameters, effectiveness in the population, safety (especially in children), incidence, and mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and effects on extrapulmonary organs. Finally, we found that APRV is likely associated with improvement in ARDS outcomes, and does not increase injury to the lungs and other organs, thereby indicating that personalized APRV settings may be the new hope for ARDS treatment.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeAirway pressure release ventilationOrgan protectionOutcomeVentilator-induced lung injury

Identifiers

PMID36785647
PMCPMC8958099
OpenAlexW4220984199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.