ReviewJournal of intensive medicine2022
Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome?
Review in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation vs. Low Tidal Volume Ventilation on Right Heart Function in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Study
Comparative Study Between Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge and practice of airway pressure release ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome among ICU nurses and respiratory therapists in China: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Successful application of airway pressure release ventilation in a child with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by trauma: a case report.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a primer.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Management of refractory hypoxemia using recruitment maneuvers and rescue therapies: A comprehensive review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential life support method for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is one of the most common critical illnesses with high mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). A lung-protective ventilation strategy based on low tidal volume (LTV) has been recommended since a few years; however, as this did not result in a significant decrease of ARDS-related mortality, a more optimal ventilation mode was required. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is an old method defined as a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with a brief intermittent release phase based on the open lung concept; it also perfectly fits the ARDS treatment principle. Despite this, APRV has not been widely used in the past, rather only as a rescue measure for ARDS patients who are difficult to oxygenate. Over recent years, with an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ARDS, APRV has been reproposed to improve patient prognosis. Nevertheless, this mode is still not routinely used in ARDS patients given its vague definition and complexity. Consequently, in this paper, we summarize the studies that used APRV in ARDS, including adults, children, and animals, to illustrate the settings of parameters, effectiveness in the population, safety (especially in children), incidence, and mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and effects on extrapulmonary organs. Finally, we found that APRV is likely associated with improvement in ARDS outcomes, and does not increase injury to the lungs and other organs, thereby indicating that personalized APRV settings may be the new hope for ARDS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.