ArticleDialogues in health2022
Reliability and factor analysis of Hindi version of IES-R scale: Effect of Rajyoga meditation on perceiving the impact of COVID-19.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to present the Hindi translation and validation of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and to evaluate psychometric qualities of this scale in a sample of regular Rajyoga meditators to examine the psychological impact of Coronavirus on them. The convenience sampling method was used to collect the data from 801 Rajyoga meditators through online survey. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.0. The Hindi version of IES-R demonstrated good internal consistency with the value of alpha coefficient being 0.91 for the scale and ranging between 0.81 to 0.83 for the subscales. The correlations between the subscales varied between 0.55 and 0.66. Principal components analysis using Varimax rotation was run with three-factor solution based on eigen value greater than one. This solution explained 54 percent of the total variance. It generated mainly two factors, an intrusion hyperarousal factor and an avoidance factor and third factor with one item only. Only 4.7 percent of the meditators rated the outbreak's psychological impact as moderate or severe. The mean score of IES-R was 10.01 (with an S.D. of 11.107). Significant positive correlations were found among IES-R scores and the presence of COVID symptoms. Thus, in clinical and research contexts, the scale appears to be a valid measure of post-trauma occurrences. The present study was conducted to generate a validated Hindi version of the IES-R that is easier and more compatible for use in the Indian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.