ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
The role of VATS in the removal of intrathoracic foreign bodies - a systematic review.
Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nine Months With a Pin: Thoracotomy After Repeated Bronchoscopic Failures in a 16-Year-Old With Hijab Syndrome.Cureus · 2026Article
- Thoracoscopic retrieval of a rare migrated fish bone in the thorax: a case report with sequential CT evidence and literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Retrieval of an Intrathoracic Knife.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To date, no systematic review or meta-analysis study has been conducted regarding the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the removal of intrathoracic foreign bodies (FB). This systematic review aims to evaluate the feasibility of VATS in the removal of intrathoracic FBs. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify reports published up to April 1, 2022. Results: The initial systematic search revealed a total of 208 papers, of which only 54 studies reporting 71 cases were included in this systematic review. Among the patients, 46 (64.8%) were male, 22 (31%) were female, and 3 (4.2%) were unknown. The mean age was 34.5 ± 24.3 years (1 day to 98 years). The patients were of 3 etiologic groups: iatrogenic (31, 43.7%), traumatic (28, 39.4%), and accidental (9, 12.7%). Most of the patients were emergency cases (27, 38%). The most frequently used imaging modalities to diagnose these foreign bodies were X-ray (46, 64.8%), followed by computed tomography (44, 62%), and ultrasonography (16, 22.5%). About 43% of all the foreign bodies were therapeutic equipment. The pleural cavity had the highest involvement (36.8%), followed by the lung parenchyma (14.6%) and thoracic cavity (13.2%). Regardless of the number of access ports, all the patients had a good clinical outcome. Conclusion: VATS is a safe and effective method for the removal of intrathoracic FBs from various thoracic sites that are associated with a good clinical outcome - in both elective and emergency cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.