Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785582›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive medicine2023

Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, including COVID-19.

Tommaso Rosà, Luca Salvatore Menga, Ambika Tejpal, Melania Cesarano, Teresa Michi, Michael C Sklar, Domenico Luca Grieco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tommaso RosàDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Luca Salvatore MengaDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Ambika TejpalDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Melania CesaranoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Teresa MichiDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Michael C SklarInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Domenico Luca GriecoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal initial non-invasive management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), of both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 etiologies, has been the subject of significant discussion. Avoidance of endotracheal intubation reduces related complications, but maintenance of spontaneous breathing with intense respiratory effort may increase risks of patients' self-inflicted lung injury, leading to delayed intubation and worse clinical outcomes. High-flow nasal oxygen is currently recommended as the optimal strategy for AHRF management for its simplicity and beneficial physiological effects. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), delivered as either pressure support or continuous positive airway pressure via interfaces like face masks and helmets, can improve oxygenation and may be associated with reduced endotracheal intubation rates. However, treatment failure is common and associated with poor outcomes. Expertise and knowledge of the specific features of each interface are necessary to fully exploit their potential benefits and minimize risks. Strict clinical and physiological monitoring is necessary during any treatment to avoid delays in endotracheal intubation and protective ventilation. In this narrative review, we analyze the physiological benefits and risks of spontaneous breathing in AHRF, and the characteristics of tools for delivering NIV. The goal herein is to provide a contemporary, evidence-based overview of this highly relevant topic.

Indexed as

Hypoxemic respiratory failureNon-invasive ventilationSelf-inflicted lung injury

Identifiers

PMID36785582
PMCPMC9596174
OpenAlexW4307142983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.