Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36785573›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2023

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on IBD Care in Alberta: Patient and Provider Perspectives.

Monica Dahiya, Lily Olayinka, Gilaad G Kaplan, Leanne Reeb, Christopher Ma, Remo Panaccione, Karen I Kroeker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Models of outpatient care delivery in inflammatory bowel disease: a scoping review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Increased Hospitalization for IBD Patients Seen in the ER During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica DahiyaDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lily OlayinkaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gilaad G KaplanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-0556
Leanne ReebDepartment of Medicine, Digestive Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada.
Christopher MaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4698-9948
Remo PanaccioneDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen I KroekerDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated changes in the delivery of ambulatory care for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including transitioning many visits to virtual formats and delaying non-urgent assessments. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on IBD patient care from health care providers' (HCP) and patients' perspectives. Methods: We administered a 42-question HCP survey and a 44-question patient survey, which evaluated HCP and patient experience and satisfaction with care delivery and delays in access to IBD care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Surveys were completed by 19.2% (24/125) HCPs and 25.8% (408/1581) patients. Overall, 82.7% of patients with IBD maintained their care without disruption. The majority of patients were satisfied with a transition to virtual care. All HCPs were willing to use virtual care in the future; however, 60% (14/24) of HCPs reported that virtual care was not equivalent to in-person visits. Patients reported concerns around access to health resources, the uncertainty of IBD-specific care, and fear and stress due to employment uncertainty and safety. Providers also reported concerns about patient safety, patient education, adequate remuneration and challenges with providing care for new patients on virtual platforms. Conclusion: While some delays in health care delivery occurred during the first wave of the pandemic, both patients and HCPs were satisfied with a transition to new models of care delivery. These models may remain in place post-pandemic and allow for flexibility in care delivery that is acceptable to both patients and HCPs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Inflammatory bowel diseasePandemicPatient carePatient experienceProvider satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36785573
PMCPMC8807203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.