ArticleACS measurement science au2022
Voltammetric Mapping of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Pt Locally via Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lattice-guided growth of dense arrays of aligned transition metal dichalcogenide nanoribbons with high catalytic reactivity.Science advances · 2025Article
- Gas-Liquid-Solid Three-Phase Boundary in Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy.ACS measurement science au · 2024Article
- Copper foam supported g-CScientific reports · 2023Article
- Getting the Most Out of Fluorogenic Probes: Challenges and Opportunities in Using Single-Molecule Fluorescence to Image Electro- and Photocatalysis.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2023Review
- Operando Scanning Electrochemical Probe Microscopy during Electrocatalysis.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- The New Era of High-Throughput Nanoelectrochemistry.Analytical chemistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancement in nanoscale electrochemical tools has offered the opportunity to better understand heterogeneity at electrochemical interfaces. Scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) has been increasingly used for revealing local kinetics and the distribution of active sites in electrocatalysis. Constant-contact scanning and hopping scanning are the two commonly used modes. The former is intrinsically faster, whereas the latter enables full voltammetry at individual locations. Herein, we revisit a less used mode that combines the advantages of hopping and constant-contact scan, resulting in a faster voltammetric mapping. In this mode, the nanodroplet cell in SECCM maintains contact with the surface during the scanning and makes intermittent pauses for local voltammetry. The elimination of frequent retraction and approach greatly increases the speed of mapping. In addition,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.