ArticleBMC biology2023
Epigenome-wide analysis of aging effects on liver regeneration.
Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatocyte Embryonic Ectoderm Development (Eed) Deficiency Causes Liver Injury, Fibrosis, and Impacts Liver Regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous quantification of cytidine, methylcytidine, and hydroxymethylcytidine by isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS with application to mouse liver samples.Journal of chromatography. A · 2026Article
- Ageing versus developmental silencing: Answers from the epigenome.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- Modelling the liver's regenerative capacity across different clinical conditions.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Influencing factors and mechanism of hepatocyte regeneration.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Delaying liver aging: Analysis of structural and functional alterations.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Molecular mechanisms in liver repair and regeneration: from physiology to therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- IMPDH Inhibition Decreases TERT Expression and Synergizes the Cytotoxic Effect of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Glioblastoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Transcriptional control of a stem cell factor nucleostemin in liver regeneration and aging.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAging is known to exert an effect on liver regeneration, with the ability of liver to regenerate displaying a significant decline over time. Liver physiological parameters such as liver volume, blood flow, and metabolism, as well as the ability to regenerate after injury have all been shown to decrease at old age in humans and model systems, with a number of molecular mechanisms proposed to be involved, including DNA methylation-dependent genome remodeling. To address how changes in DNA methylation mediate the adverse aging effect on liver regeneration, we searched for differentially methylated genomic regions (DMRs) in mouse livers co-regulated by aging and regeneration and determined their associated genes and enriched pathways.
resultsDMRs were identified using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Pathway analysis of aging DMR-mapped genes revealed two distinct phases of aging, 2-to-8 and 8-to-16 months old (m/o). Regenerative DMR-mapped differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched in pathways controlling cell proliferation and differentiation. Most DMRs shared by both aging and regeneration changed in the same methylation direction between 2 and 8 m/o but in the opposite direction between 8 and 16 m/o. Regenerative DMRs inversely affected by aging during 8-to-16 m/o were found in the promoter/gene regions of 12 genes. Four regenerative DEGs were synchronously regulated by early aging and inversely regulated by mid-to-late aging DMRs. Lead DMR-mapped genes were validated by their expression profiles in liver aging and regeneration.
conclusionsOur study has uncovered new DMRs and gene targets inversely affected by liver aging and regeneration to explain the adverse aging effect on liver regeneration. These findings will be of fundamental importance to understand the epigenomic changes underlying the biology of aging on liver regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.