Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36782243›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

Epigenome-wide analysis of aging effects on liver regeneration.

Junying Wang, Wen Zhang, Xiaoqin Liu, Minjee Kim, Ke Zhang, Robert Y L Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Influencing factors and mechanism of hepatocyte regeneration.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junying WangInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Wen ZhangInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Xiaoqin LiuInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Minjee KimInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ke ZhangInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Robert Y L TsaiInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. robtsai@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-0812
Texas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

Discovery of New DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Predicting the Malignant Outcome of Low-Grade Oral DysplasiaR21DE032821 · NIDCR · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI TSAI, ROBERT Y · 2023 to 2024
$418k
Aging Effect on Genome Maintenance during Hepatocyte RegenerationR21AG052006 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI TSAI, ROBERT Y · 2016 to 2017
$408k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG052006NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE032821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAging is known to exert an effect on liver regeneration, with the ability of liver to regenerate displaying a significant decline over time. Liver physiological parameters such as liver volume, blood flow, and metabolism, as well as the ability to regenerate after injury have all been shown to decrease at old age in humans and model systems, with a number of molecular mechanisms proposed to be involved, including DNA methylation-dependent genome remodeling. To address how changes in DNA methylation mediate the adverse aging effect on liver regeneration, we searched for differentially methylated genomic regions (DMRs) in mouse livers co-regulated by aging and regeneration and determined their associated genes and enriched pathways.

resultsDMRs were identified using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Pathway analysis of aging DMR-mapped genes revealed two distinct phases of aging, 2-to-8 and 8-to-16 months old (m/o). Regenerative DMR-mapped differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched in pathways controlling cell proliferation and differentiation. Most DMRs shared by both aging and regeneration changed in the same methylation direction between 2 and 8 m/o but in the opposite direction between 8 and 16 m/o. Regenerative DMRs inversely affected by aging during 8-to-16 m/o were found in the promoter/gene regions of 12 genes. Four regenerative DEGs were synchronously regulated by early aging and inversely regulated by mid-to-late aging DMRs. Lead DMR-mapped genes were validated by their expression profiles in liver aging and regeneration.

conclusionsOur study has uncovered new DMRs and gene targets inversely affected by liver aging and regeneration to explain the adverse aging effect on liver regeneration. These findings will be of fundamental importance to understand the epigenomic changes underlying the biology of aging on liver regeneration.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeAgingAnimalsDNA MethylationHumansInfantLiver RegenerationMiceDNA methylationEpigeneticTissue repairWGBS

Identifiers

PMID36782243
PMCPMC9926786
OpenAlexW4320482364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.