Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36782204›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

A novel digital arthrometer to measure anterior tibial translation.

Danni Wu, Donghai Wang, Yongjie Han, Luqi Guo, Shaobai Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Comparative study of I.D.E.A.L. technique and transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. BLU-DAT: a new reliable and accurate arthrometer for measuring anterior knee laxity.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danni WuKey Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, 200 Hengren Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Donghai WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Orthopedic Institute of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Road, Soochow, China.
Yongjie HanLaboratory of Biomechanics and Engineering, Innomotion, 518 Xinzhuan Road, Caohejing Development Zone, Shanghai, China.
Luqi GuoKey Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, 200 Hengren Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Shaobai WangKey Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, 200 Hengren Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China. wangs@innomotion.biz.
Shanghai University of Sport · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

Key Basic Research Project of the Military Commission Basic Strengthening Program on motion biomechanics; Shanghai Outstanding Academic/Technical Leaders Program Funding NO. 21XD1434800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is crucial for appropriate treatment and rehabilitation decision-making. This study examined the potential of a new digital arthrometer (Ligs, Innomotion, Shanghai, China) to quantify anterior tibial translation (ATT) in patients with ACL injuries and in healthy subjects.

methodsA total of 60 participants included 30 subjects with single-leg ACL injuries and 30 healthy subjects included as controls. The lower leg was immobilized. The thruster is positioned posterior to the lower leg and parallel to the tibial tuberosity in the sagittal plane. The load is applied vertically to the tibia under a dynamic load of 0-150 N, with continuous displacement recorded. The intrarater and interrater reliability will be examined. ATT and side-to-side differences (SSD) between the control and ACL injury groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Ligs.

resultsThe interrater ICC was 0.909 and the intrarater ICC was 0.943. Significant differences in the SSD were observed between the control and ACL injury groups (for all P < 0.05), with the largest effect size (ES = 1.12) at 80 N. When comparing ATT at different loads between injured and healthy sides in the ACL injury group, displacement was statistically significant at different loads. At a load of 150 N, the AUC was the maximum (0.857) and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 and 0.73, respectively.

conclusionsA digital arthrometer can be used as a quantitative instrument to quantify knee laxity. Quantitative measurement of ATT and SSD under controlled loading can be an objective and effective tool for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesJoint InstabilityBiomechanical PhenomenaChinaHumansKnee JointReproducibility of ResultsTibiaAnterior cruciate ligamentAnterior tibial translationDigital arthrometerKnee laxityQuantitative study

Identifiers

PMID36782204
PMCPMC9926554
OpenAlexW4320480550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.