Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36782189›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Approaches to optimising access to NICE-approved biologic anti-TNFs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderately active disease.

Peter C Taylor, Ayman Askari, Ernest Choy, Michael R Ehrenstein, Sara Else, Muhammad K Nisar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Peter C TaylorBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. peter.taylor@kennedy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-6167
Ayman AskariRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust, Oswestry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9414-7350
Ernest ChoyDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4459-8609
Michael R EhrensteinCentre for Rheumatology, UCL Division of Medicine, Rayne Building, 5 University Street, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1673-743X
Sara ElseNHS Forth Valley, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-0223
Muhammad K NisarLuton & Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5132-3972
Cardiff University · GBLuton and Dunstable Hospital · GBNHS Forth Valley · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with joint pain and stiffness. Biologics represent some of the most effective treatments for RA, but previous guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has limited their use to patients with severely active disease. This has meant patients with moderately active RA have been treated as if they have an acceptable disease state, despite many cases where the inflammation has a major impact on joint damage, mobility, pain and quality of life. However, recent guideline changes (NICE TA715) have approved the use of three biologics - adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab - for the treatment of moderately active RA. MAIN BODY: In response to these changes, we have held discussions with medical teams from across the UK to consider the main implications for implementation of these new recommendations, as well as any differences in approach that may exist at a local level. Several key challenges were identified. These included establishing methods of educating both physicians and patients concerning the new availability of the biologic treatments, with suggestions of various organisations that could be approached to circulate informative material. Identifying which patients with moderately active RA stand to benefit was another discussion topic. Relying solely on scoring systems like Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) was acknowledged to have limitations, and alternative complementary approaches such as ultrasound, as well as assessing a patient's co-morbidities, could also be useful tools in determining those who could benefit from biologics. An additional challenge for the process of patient identification has been the increase in the use of telemedicine consultations in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. More use of patient-reported outcomes was raised as one possible solution, and the importance of maintaining up-to-date databases on patient disease scores and treatment history was also stressed.

conclusionWhile challenges exist in education and identifying patients who may benefit from the use of biologics, the NICE TA715 recommendations hold great potential in addressing an unmet need for the treatment of moderate RA.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCOVID-19HumansQuality of LifeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsBiologicsBiosimilarsModerate rheumatoid arthritisNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)Telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36782189
PMCPMC9925364
OpenAlexW4320481181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.