Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36782122›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2023

Implementing a home-based personalised cognitive rehabilitation intervention for people with mild-to-moderate dementia: GREAT into Practice.

Linda Clare, Aleksandra Kudlicka, Rachel Collins, Suzannah Evans, Jackie Pool, Catherine Henderson, Martin Knapp, Rachael Litherland, Jan Oyebode, Robert Woods

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Cognitive Reablement Using Digital Voice Assistants for People Living With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rehabilitation Services for Young-Onset Dementia: Examples from High- and Low-Middle-Income Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Linda ClareUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. l.clare@exeter.ac.uk.
Aleksandra KudlickaUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Rachel CollinsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Suzannah EvansBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.
Jackie PoolQCS Quality Compliance Systems, London, UK.
Catherine HendersonCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Martin KnappCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Rachael LitherlandInnovations in Dementia CIC, Exeter, UK.
Jan OyebodeCentre for Applied Dementia Studies, Bradford University, Bradford, UK.
Robert WoodsDementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
University of Exeter · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBBangor University · GBDementia UK · GBHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBWrexham University · GB

Funding

Alzheimer's Society AS-IGF-16-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based rehabilitative interventions, if widely implemented, could equip people with dementia and their families to manage life with the condition and reduce the need for health and care services. The aim of this translational study, building on evidence from the GREAT randomised controlled trial, was to develop a foundation for implementing the GREAT Cognitive Rehabilitation intervention in community-based services for people with mild-to-moderate dementia.

methodsKey elements of the implementation strategy were identifying and supporting managerial and clinical leadership, conducting collaborative planning and target-setting, training and supporting practitioners, and providing external facilitation. We developed implementation plans with, and trained staff in, 14 organisations. We subsequently worked closely with 11 of these, 10 National Health Service organisations and one private home care provider, to support practitioners to deliver GREAT Cognitive Rehabilitation over a 12-month period. Outcome evaluation examined the perspectives of local steering group members, practitioners and service users, and the reach, effectiveness and cost of the intervention.

resultsImplementation was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but six organisations completed at least six months of intervention delivery. Forty-one practitioners, mainly occupational therapists, provided the intervention, and 54 people with dementia completed a course of GREAT Cognitive Rehabilitation. Goal attainment by people with dementia exceeded levels of improvement seen in the original trial. People with dementia, carers, practitioners and steering group members all evaluated the intervention positively, and economic analysis indicated that the intervention could be provided at modest cost. However, we identified a range of mainly organisational barriers that impeded implementation and limited the potential for sustainability.

conclusionsGREAT Cognitive Rehabilitation benefits people with dementia, can be delivered effectively at modest cost in routine services, and is viewed positively by people with dementia, family carers and practitioners. To fully realise these benefits and achieve widespread and sustainable implementation, however, requires sufficient resources and a reorientation of service priorities towards preventive and rehabilitative approaches.

trial registrationNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Central Portfolio Management System, registration number 38994.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaCognitive TrainingHumansPandemicsState MedicineActivities of daily livingAlzheimer’s diseaseCarersDementia with Lewy bodiesDisabilityFunctional abilityOccupational therapyParkinson’s diseaseReablementVascular dementia

Identifiers

PMID36782122
PMCPMC9925212
OpenAlexW4320482826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.