Trial reportEye (London, England)2023
Weight-adjusted caffeine and β-blocker use in novice versus senior retina surgeons: a self-controlled study of simulated performance.
Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTremor and expertise are potentially influenced variables in vitreoretinal surgery. We investigated whether surgeon experience impacts the association of microsurgical performance with caffeine and β-blockers weight-adjusted intake. SUBJECTS/
methodsNovice and senior surgeons (<2 and >10 practice years, respectively) were recruited in this self-controlled, cross-sectional study. A simulator's task sequence was repeated over 2 days, 30 min after the following exposures: day 1, placebo, 2.5 mg/kg caffeine, 5.0 mg/kg caffeine, and 0.6 mg/kg propranolol; and day 2, placebo, 0.2 mg/kg propranolol, 0.6 mg/kg propranolol, and 5.0 mg/kg caffeine. Outcomes were total score (0-700, worst-best), simulation time (minutes), intraocular trajectory (centimeters), and tremor-specific score (0-100, worst-best).
resultsWe recruited 15 novices (9 men [60%], 1.33 ± 0.49 practice years) and 11 seniors (8 men [72.7%], 16.00 ± 4.24 practice years). Novices performed worse after 2.5 mg/kg caffeine and improved following 0.2 mg/kg propranolol in total score (557 vs. 617, p = 0.009), trajectory (229.86 vs. 208.07, p = 0.048), time (14.9 vs. 12.7, p = 0.048), and tremor-score (55 vs. 75, p = 0.009). Surgical performance improved with propranolol post-caffeine but remained worse than 0.2 mg/kg propranolol in total score (570 vs. 617, p = 0.014), trajectory (226.59 vs. 208.07, p = 0.033), and tremor-score (50 vs. 75, p = 0.029). Seniors' tremor-score was lower after 2.5 mg/kg caffeine compared to 0.2 mg/kg propranolol (8 vs. 37, p = 0.015). Tremor-score following propranolol post-caffeine remained inferior to 0.6 mg/kg propranolol alone (17 vs. 38, p = 0.012).
conclusionWhile caffeine and propranolol were associated with performance changes among novices, only tremor was affected in seniors, without dexterity changes. The pharmacologic exposure impact on surgical dexterity seems to be offset by increased experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.