Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781920›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A machine learning pipeline to classify foetal heart rate deceleration with optimal feature set.

Sahana Das, Sk Md Obaidullah, Mufti Mahmud, M Shamim Kaiser, Kaushik Roy, Chanchal Kumar Saha, Kaushik Goswami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sahana DasWest Bengal State University, Kolkata, 700126, India.
Sk Md ObaidullahAliah University, Kolkata, 700156, India.
Mufti MahmudDepartment of Computer Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK. mufti.mahmud@ntu.ac.uk.
M Shamim KaiserJahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh.
Kaushik RoyWest Bengal State University, Kolkata, 700126, India.
Chanchal Kumar SahaBiraj Mohini Matri-Sadan & Hospital, Kolkata, 700126, India.
Kaushik GoswamiTata Consultancy Services, Kolkata, 700156, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deceleration is considered a commonly practised means to assess Foetal Heart Rate (FHR) through visual inspection and interpretation of patterns in Cardiotocography (CTG). The precision of deceleration classification relies on the accurate estimation of corresponding event points (EP) from the FHR and the Uterine Contraction Pressure (UCP). This work proposes a deceleration classification pipeline by comparing four machine learning (ML) models, namely, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), and Simple Logistics Regression. Towards an automated classification of deceleration from EP using the pipeline, it systematically compares three approaches to create feature sets from the detected EP: (1) a novel fuzzy logic (FL)-based approach, (2) expert annotation by clinicians, and (3) calculated using National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines. The classification results were validated using different popular statistical metrics, including receiver operating characteristic curve, intra-class correlation coefficient, Deming regression, and Bland-Altman Plot. The highest classification accuracy (97.94%) was obtained with MLP when the EP was annotated with the proposed FL approach compared to RF, which obtained 63.92% with the clinician-annotated EP. The results indicate that the FL annotated feature set is the optimal one for classifying deceleration from FHR.

Indexed as

DecelerationHeart Rate, FetalBayes TheoremCardiotocographyChildFemaleHumansMachine LearningPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36781920
PMCPMC9925757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.