Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781917›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Detection of acute promyelocytic leukemia in peripheral blood and bone marrow with annotation-free deep learning.

Petru Manescu, Priya Narayanan, Christopher Bendkowski, Muna Elmi, Remy Claveau, Vijay Pawar, Biobele J Brown, Mike Shaw, Anupama Rao, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GPTNeXt: Biomedical Image Classification Investigations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Petru ManescuDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. p.manescu@ucl.ac.uk.
Priya NarayananDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Christopher BendkowskiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Muna ElmiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Remy ClaveauDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Vijay PawarDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Biobele J BrownDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Mike ShawDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Anupama RaoDepartment of Haematology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Delmiro Fernandez-ReyesDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. delmiro.fernandez-reyes@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBUniversity of Ibadan · NGDepartment of Science and Technology · INGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While optical microscopy inspection of blood films and bone marrow aspirates by a hematologist is a crucial step in establishing diagnosis of acute leukemia, especially in low-resource settings where other diagnostic modalities are not available, the task remains time-consuming and prone to human inconsistencies. This has an impact especially in cases of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) that require urgent treatment. Integration of automated computational hematopathology into clinical workflows can improve the throughput of these services and reduce cognitive human error. However, a major bottleneck in deploying such systems is a lack of sufficient cell morphological object-labels annotations to train deep learning models. We overcome this by leveraging patient diagnostic labels to train weakly-supervised models that detect different types of acute leukemia. We introduce a deep learning approach, Multiple Instance Learning for Leukocyte Identification (MILLIE), able to perform automated reliable analysis of blood films with minimal supervision. Without being trained to classify individual cells, MILLIE differentiates between acute lymphoblastic and myeloblastic leukemia in blood films. More importantly, MILLIE detects APL in blood films (AUC 0.94 ± 0.04) and in bone marrow aspirates (AUC 0.99 ± 0.01). MILLIE is a viable solution to augment the throughput of clinical pathways that require assessment of blood film microscopy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLeukemia, Promyelocytic, AcuteBone MarrowHematologic TestsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36781917
PMCPMC9925435
OpenAlexW4320484575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.