Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781824›Full record

ReviewPurinergic signalling2023

Targeting the A3 adenosine receptor to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: anti-cancer and hepatoprotective effects.

Pnina Fishman, Salomon M Stemmer, Avital Bareket-Samish, Michael H Silverman, William D Kerns

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Purinergic signalling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bitopic AJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Small-molecule-based targeted therapy in liver cancer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Review
  7. Purinergic Signaling in Non-Parenchymal Liver Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. 2-Substituted (N)-Methanocarba AACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Extrahelical Binding Site for a 1Molecular pharmacology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pnina FishmanCan-Fite BioPharma Ltd., 10 Bareket St., 49170, Petah Tikva, Israel. Pnina@canfite.co.il.ORCID 0000-0001-9641-6630
Salomon M StemmerDavidoff Cancer Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-3929
Avital Bareket-SamishBioInsight Ltd., 3056814, Binyamina, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4849-7891
Michael H SilvermanCan-Fite BioPharma Ltd., 10 Bareket St., 49170, Petah Tikva, Israel.
William D KernsCan-Fite BioPharma Ltd., 10 Bareket St., 49170, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Can-Fite BioPharma (Israel) · ILRabin Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) is over-expressed in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Namodenoson, an A3AR agonist, induces de-regulation of the Wnt and NF-kB signaling pathways resulting in apoptosis of HCC cells. In a phase I healthy volunteer study and in a phase I/II study in patients with advanced HCC, namodenoson was safe and well tolerated. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed in the phase I/II trial in a subset of patients with advanced disease, namely patients with Child-Pugh B (CPB) hepatic dysfunction, whose median overall survival (OS) on namodenoson was 8.1 months. A phase II blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was subsequently conducted in patients with advanced HCC and CPB cirrhosis. The primary endpoint of OS superiority over placebo was not met. However, subgroup analysis of CPB7 patients (34 namodenoson-treated, 22 placebo-treated) showed nonsignificant differences in OS/progression-free survival and a significant difference in 12-month OS (44% vs 18%, p = 0.028). Partial response was achieved in 9% of namodenoson-treated patients vs 0% in placebo-treated patients. Based on the positive efficacy signal in HCC CPB7 patients and the favorable safety profile of namodenoson, a phase III study is underway.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansLiver CirrhosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, Purinergic P1Antineoplastic AgentsReceptors, Purinergic P1A3 adenosine receptorChild–Pugh BClinical studyHepatocellular carcinomaLiver cancerNamodenoson

Identifiers

PMID36781824
PMCPMC10539266
OpenAlexW4320482911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.