ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
RNA Modification Detection Using Nanopore Direct RNA Sequencing and nanoDoc2.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced deep learning strategies in nanopore RNA sequencing.RNA biology · 2026Review
- ModiCal: A Targeted Calibration Workflow for Site-Specific mACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- Deciphering RNA modification dynamics during spermatogenesis and sperm maturation.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- RNA modifications in cancer and their detection: a review.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Epigenetic regulation of cardiovascular diseases induced by behavioral and environmental risk factors: Mechanistic, diagnostic, and therapeutic insights.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Review
- m6ATM: a deep learning framework for demystifying the m6A epitranscriptome with Nanopore long-read RNA-seq data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Non-Targeted RNA Sequencing: Towards the Development of Universal Clinical Diagnosis Methods for Human and Veterinary Infectious Diseases.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA modifications regulate multiple aspects of cellular function including RNA splicing, translation, export, decay, stability, and phase separation. One of the comprehensive ways to detect such modifications is by the recent advancement of direct RNA sequencing from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). However, this method obtains a large amount of data with high complexity in the form of raw current signal that poses a new informatics challenge to accurately detect those modifications. Here, we provide nanoDoc2, a software to detect multiple types of RNA modification from nanopore direct RNA sequencing data. The nanoDoc2 includes a novel signal segmentation algorithm based on the trace value-a base probability feature that is added by the Guppy basecalling program from ONT during processing of the raw signal. The core of nanoDoc2 includes a machine learning algorithm in which a 6-mer segmented raw current signal is analyzed by deep one-class classification using a WaveNet-based neural network. As an output, an RNA modification is detected by a statistical score in each candidate position. Herein, we describe the detailed instructions on how to use nanoDoc2 for signal segmentation, train/test the neural network, and finally predict RNA modifications present in nanopore direct RNA sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36781737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.