Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781713›Full record

ArticleRice (New York, N.Y.)2023

Analysis of the Genetic Stability of Insect and Herbicide Resistance Genes in Transgenic Rice Lines: A Laboratory and Field Experiment.

Yue Sun, Zhongkai Chen, Huizhen Chen, Chunlei Wang, Bai Li, Lu Qin, Xiaoli Lin, Yicong Cai, Dahu Zhou, Linjuan Ouyang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rice (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue Sun *Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Zhongkai Chen *Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Huizhen ChenKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Chunlei WangKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Bai LiKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Lu QinKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaoli LinKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yicong CaiKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Dahu ZhouKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Linjuan OuyangKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Changlan ZhuKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Haohua HeKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. hhhua64@163.com.
Xiaosong PengKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education /College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. pxs63@163.com.
Jiangxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Jiangxi Provincial major science and technology research project 20203ABC28W013the Major Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology 2016NYZPF0256the Major Project supported by Breeding New Varieties of the National Transgene 2016ZX08001-001-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of stability in the expression of Bacillus thuringiensis genes (CRY) and the dialaninophosphate resistance gene (BAR) in transgenic rice plants can lead to the loss of important characters. The genetic stability of transgenic expression in high-generation lines is thus critically important for ensuring the success of molecular breeding efforts. Here, we studied the genetic stability of resistance to insect pests and herbicides in transgenic rice lines at the molecular and phenotypic levels in a pesticide-free environment. Southern blot analysis, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays revealed high stability in the copy numbers and expression levels of CRY1C, CRY2A, and BAR in transgenic lines across different generations, and gene expression levels were highly correlated with protein expression levels. The insecticide resistance of the transgenic rice lines was high. The larval mortality of Chilo suppressalis was 50.25% to 68.36% higher in transgenic lines than in non-transgenic control lines. Percent dead hearts and percent white spikelets were 16.66% to 22.15% and 27.07% to 33.47% lower in transgenic lines than in non-transgenic control lines, respectively. The herbicide resistance of the transgenic rice lines was also high. The bud length and root length ranged were 2.53 cm to 4.20 cm and 0.28 cm to 0.73 cm higher in transgenic lines than in non-transgenic control lines in the budding stage, respectively. Following application of the herbicide Basta, the chlorophyll content of the transgenic lines began to recover 2 d later in the seedling and tillering stages and 3 d later in the booting and heading stages, by contrast, the chlorophyll content of the non-transgenic lines did not recover and continued to decrease. These findings revealed high genetic stability of the resistance to insect pests and herbicides across several generations of transgenic rice regardless of the genetic background.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisGenetic stabilityHerbicide resistanceInsect resistanceTransgenic rice

Identifiers

PMID36781713
PMCPMC9925649
OpenAlexW4320483939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.