Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781701›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Logistic regression with sparse common and distinctive covariates.

S Park, E Ceulemans, K Van Deun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S ParkTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands. s.park_1@tilburguniversity.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8302-9690
E CeulemansKU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
K Van DeunTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Having large sets of predictor variables from multiple sources concerning the same individuals is becoming increasingly common in behavioral research. On top of the variable selection problem, predicting a categorical outcome using such data gives rise to an additional challenge of identifying the processes at play underneath the predictors. These processes are of particular interest in the setting of multi-source data because they can either be associated individually with a single data source or jointly with multiple sources. Although many methods have addressed the classification problem in high dimensionality, the additional challenge of distinguishing such underlying predictor processes from multi-source data has not received sufficient attention. To this end, we propose the method of Sparse Common and Distinctive Covariates Logistic Regression (SCD-Cov-logR). The method is a multi-source extension of principal covariates regression that combines with generalized linear modeling framework to allow classification of a categorical outcome. In a simulation study, SCD-Cov-logR resulted in outperformance compared to related methods commonly used in behavioral sciences. We also demonstrate the practical usage of the method under an empirical dataset.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsClassificationCommon and distinctive processesData integrationLogistic regressionMultiblock dataPrincipal covariates regression

Identifiers

PMID36781701
PMCPMC10700465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.