Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781622›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2023

Chemotherapy Duration for Various Indications in Colorectal Cancer: a Review.

Angela Damato, Michele Ghidini, Lorenzo Dottorini, Gianluca Tomasello, Alessandro Iaculli, Antonio Ghidini, Andrea Luciani, Fausto Petrelli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Tumor Parenchymal and Stromal Ratios in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Angela DamatoMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL (Unità Sanitaria Locale) - IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Michele GhidiniOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCs Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo DottoriniOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, Seriate, BG, Italy.
Gianluca TomaselloOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCs Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Alessandro IaculliOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, Seriate, BG, Italy.
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa Di Cura Igea, Milano, Italy.
Andrea LucianiOncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Fausto PetrelliOncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio (BG), Italy. faupe@libero.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-4486
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Bergamo · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITCasa di Cura Columbus · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved and become more personalized during the past several years. For example, depotentiation/reduced duration of systemic therapies has proven to be beneficial in both advanced and early stages of the disease. RECENT

findingsIn particular, recent randomized studies of stage III and high-risk stage II CRC showed that a shorter duration (3 months), when compared to the historical 6-month comparator, provides nearly similar overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the setting of advanced, inoperable CRC, a relatively short induction phase (six to eight cycles) followed by biological agents is the current standard of care in RAS wild-type (wt). versus RAS mutated cases. With regard to potentially operable stage IV disease (with the aim of converting liver metastases to operability), a relatively short number of cycles (four to six cycles) should be offered with re-staging and re-evaluation for surgery as soon as possible in most cases. For inoperable liver metastases, a relatively intensive triplet or doublet plus targeted therapy may attain conversion in some cases and may even result in cure. Rectal cancer treatment continues to be a complex disease in terms of treatment and oncological results. Recent data seem to showcase the benefits of more prolonged sequential strategies (total neoadjuvant therapy, all treatment delivered before surgery, to reduce the risk of distant metastases and local control). In recent years, different strategies regarding treatment intensity have been employed in CRC in adjuvant and metastatic setting. Introduction of triplets as first-line therapy for colon cancer and as induction phase for rectal cancer are now therapeutic options. Conversely in stage II disease or low-risk stage III resected CRC, a reduced chemotherapy length is a new standard of care.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalFluorouracilHumansFluorouracilChemotherapyColorectal cancerDurationReview

Identifiers

PMID36781622
OpenAlexW4320482630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.