Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781621›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2023

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Melanoma: Where Are We Now?

Mariam Saad, Ahmad A Tarhini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariam SaadVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ahmad A TarhiniDepartments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and University of South Florida, 10920 McKinley Dr. Tampa, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. Ahmad.Tarhini@moffitt.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3193-9702
University of South Florida · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeof reviewThis review summarizes the current state of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy for locoregionally advanced melanoma. RECENT

findingsMelanoma systemic therapy has witnessed major advances with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecularly targeted therapy that have been translated into the neoadjuvant setting in managing locoregionally advanced disease. PD1 blockade as monotherapy and combined with CTLA4 blockade or LAG3 inhibition has demonstrated major improvements in reducing the risk of relapse and death that were associated with high pathologic response rates. Similar results were reported with BRAF-MEK inhibition for BRAF mutant melanoma with high pathologic response rates that appear to be less durable compared to immunotherapy. More importantly, in a recent randomized trial, event-free survival was significantly improved with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab compared to standard surgery and adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for locoregionally advanced melanoma. Ongoing studies will define the most optimal combination regimens.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeoadjuvant TherapyCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafImmunotherapyMelanomaNeoadjuvantTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID36781621
OpenAlexW4320483712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.