Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781590›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of implant dentistry2023

Evaluation of esthetic outcome of delayed implants with de-epithelialized free gingival graft in thin gingival phenotype with or without immediate temporization: a randomized clinical trial.

Maha Fawzy, Manal Hosny, Hani El-Nahass

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of implant dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03792425 (Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score Following Delayed Implant Placement With Connective Tissue Graft With and Without Temporization in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Thin Gingival Biotype), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03792425 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score Following Delayed Implant Placement With Connective Tissue Graft With and Without Temporization in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Thin Gingival Biotype

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled16ConditionsThin GingivaArmsConnective tissue graft and implant placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maha FawzyDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 El-Saraya St. - Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Manal HosnyDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 El-Saraya St. - Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Hani El-NahassDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 El-Saraya St. - Manial, Cairo, Egypt. hani.elnahass@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0001-9101-4851
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe current study investigates the effect of immediate temporization on the pink esthetics of delayed implants in patients with thin gingival phenotype in combination with a De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft in the maxillary premolar area. METHODOLOGY: The study population was randomly assigned into two groups. The two groups were treated with delayed implants with simultaneous placement of a de-epithelialized free gingiva graft. The test group was immediately temporized while the control group had no temporization. The pink esthetic score was assessed as the primary outcome. Additional secondary outcomes were assessed such as the keratinized tissue width and the soft tissue thickness.

resultsTwenty implants were placed in the current study, split into 10 implants per group. The results showed that the Pink Esthetic Score of the IT group was 11.88 ± (1.13) and 11.33 ± (1.25) for the CTG group, which showed no statistical difference between the groups after 1 year of follow-up. There was also no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months regarding the keratinized tissue width and the soft tissue thickness.

conclusionsImmediate and delayed temporizations have no effect on the Pink Esthetics of the delayed implants; however, immediate temporization allowed earlier provisional crown delivery. Soft tissue augmentation of the thin gingival phenotype improved esthetics for both groups. Trial registration Name of the registry: clinicaltrials.gov; trial registration number: NCT03792425. Date of registration: January 3, 2019. URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792425?term=NCT03792425&draw=2&rank=1.

Indexed as

Dental Implants, Single-ToothGingivaEsthetics, DentalHumansTooth ExtractionTreatment OutcomeDe-epithelialized Free Gingival GraftDental implantsImmediate loadingThin phenotype

Identifiers

PMID36781590
PMCPMC9925631
OpenAlexW4320483825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.